• raina@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a nice, cheap, easy and legal way of obtaining the ROMs to play on flash carts, emulators and FPGA systems.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        9 days ago

        I mean. An RPi and a retropie image is nice, cheap, and easy and it gives much more than a Steam bundle. Plus the legality of paying Steam for a bundled version is - tenuous, at best. Most of those companies haven’t existed for decades and it’s not like the authors are getting royalties anyway.

    • blackbelt352@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      Why not? There’s still people born who’ve never played those games and come across them. And besides preserving legacy media is actually a worthwhile cause.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Oh absolutely, just that they’re all freely available for download in emulators. No need to pay Steam for them. It’s not like the authors are getting any of that money.

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s a solid business model: People pirate roms, begause they can’t buy them.

      If Nintendo would sell their old ass games as roms, we wouldn’t have the problem of them suing emulators into oblivion.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 days ago

        Hey - if you can get physical copies of it, great.

        A Steam bundle they can take from you with a click - nah. F that.

        • Auster@thebrainbin.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Sadly some ROMs are only distributed through Steam, and others, at least until the next month, in reference to the ones Sega is delisting, can only be reasonably obtained there.

          But indeed, Steam is not trustworthy, in this proposed case due to a publisher being able to simply disable a game’s depots instead of mass revoking licenses. And while I understand the points on getting physical medias, to my understanding, digital medias could work as an ownership system, but it would require a given platform to both distribute stuff DRM-free, and to understand that the copies an user gets are his/her to keep. (but on a side note, back up everything you can, including receipts, ASAP, just in case either the dev/publisher or the store pull a fast one).

            • Auster@thebrainbin.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 days ago

              Going by some notes I have, for example, the Japanese versions of the Castlevania games, and also the games in the Namco Museum Archives collections.

              • Optional@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                9 days ago

                Hm. I did a search for ““Namco Museum” ROMs SEGA” and it came up right away - is that not the one in question?

                • Auster@thebrainbin.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  9 days ago

                  I think we misinterpreted each other.

                  In my original comment, I mentioned two separated cases. First, a “some ROMs”, referencing a more general landscape, and then the Genesis/MD collection from Sega specifically. And the “reasonably obtained” part is because some editions are very hard to come by, may be very expensive, and/or may be a nightmare to have the ROMs extracted from.

                  Then, with your reply, I thought you were asking about the former, when, going by my following reply, it would seem you were asking about the latter and that you thought I was talking about the latter too.

                  Would that be the case?