You’re a prison abolitionist. You’re in a high stakes discussion where you have to answer seriously and be convincing.

Someone asks you : “yeah, but what are we to do with people breaking the law, then? What will you replace prisons with ?”

What will you answer?

Edit : Thanks a lot for your answer, they were very interesting and reflecting different ways to frame a world without prisons.

Except from one or two edgelord hot takes, of course.

  • pinkystew@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t need to have a replacement ready. It’s enough for me to say that the current system does not work.

    • Cadenza@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s always my first answer indeed. "Well, I’m going to answer your question but first, just think about the abolition of legal slavery a while ago. What would you have thought about someone who would object : “yeah, but what will we replace slavery with ?”.

      • Kacarott@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I support the abolishment of prisons (at least as we know them), but I don’t think this is a fair or convincing comparison. Prisons are a failed attempt to solve a real problem (what to do with people who break the rules), which is what people are concerned about. In an ideal society it will be replaced by something (rehabilitation?). Slavery solved no problem, and so needed nothing to replace it.