• ReiRose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s still an affair if it’s not secret. Fucking (over) every single woman in the country is still an affair, even if you proudly declare it to your wife and everyone you know.

  • fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    I have to wonder how good political polls are at detecting this type of thing, also motivation to actually go vote on the day.

    What I mean is, before and after the floating garbage joke, responses to polls might have been the same, but some responders might have become much more motivated to actually vote.

    Most commentators and pollsters are saying the polling is very thorough and accurate but resolving these types of issues doesn’t really seem possible to me.

  • ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    My wife just read to me a tweet (or whatever) where a husband was making his wife vote by mail so he could guarantee she voted for Trump.

    I feel like he should be charged for voting twice. If she doesn’t get to pick who to vote for, she’s not voting, he is. Send him to jail for 15 years (or for whatever they sent that woman who cast the provisional ballot because she was told she could and then she wasn’t eligible to vote in the end).

    • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      That’s actually the one coherent argument I’ve seen against voting by mail. But if someone is that closely dominated, voting is only one of their problems. I don’t think depriving everybody else of voting by mail is the right way to handle it.

      • itsprobablyfine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        The solution I’ve heard is you’re able to go to the elections office after mailing your ballot and void the mailed one and vote in person. Depending on the level of control/oversight may be not realistic for everyone, but again, at that point I’m more concerned about the human than the vote and were talking a whole other problem to solve.

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 days ago

        They think this is what everyone does. They publicly virtue signal that they oppose whichever bad thing so they can condemn others for doing it while secretly doing it themselves. It’s ok when they do it themselves anyway, because they are good people doing a necessary thing for good reasons. When others find out about their behavior, their reaction is to accuse harder, because they assume we are all doing that too and they are angry that we didn’t get caught yet.

    • ThermonuclearCactus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yeah, and we can’t give them that because trousers are a zero-sum game and if women wear trousers, then there won’t be enough trousers to go around!

      /s

  • dirthawker0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    “Voting for Harris is like having an affair”? That extrapolates into some pretty creepy implications about how they see their and their wife’s relationship with Trump.

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    If they didn’t let people take their phone with them while they fill the slip I guarantee there would be even more.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        You’re hidden while filling the ballot aren’t you? Not hard to take it out and take a picture because your crazy spouse wants to make sure you vote “for the right person”

        • bitwolf@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          It is a crime in Texas to take photograph s within 100ft of a voting machine

          It was annoying too, because Texas has huge ballots, and I took notes on my phone to help me.

        • Today@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          No. Mine looks like this but more spaced out. They have signs up about phones and the room is very well monitored. I tried to use my phone last time because i had screenshotted my vote411. They gave me a pen and a paper to go outside and write them down instead.

          Edit-forgot the pic.

          • DBT@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 days ago

            That’s weird. I saw no such signs and had my phone out when I voted. It was in my hand plain as day when I walked from the ballot table to the booth.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              4 days ago

              Guess it varies from places to places… Which is always weird from a Canadian point of view considering federal elections are handled by the federal government so the norms are the same cross country.

              • Today@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 days ago

                Ah. Yep. Phones are okay in Illinois. Phones are not okay in Texas. Those are the only two I checked.

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    So those MAGA women actually have two jobs: Vote early for Harris, and keep their husbands occupied on voting day…

  • affiliate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Jesse Watters of Fox News has even equated a wife secretly voting for Harris to “having an affair.”

    something that this article didn’t mention is that jesse walters’ current marriage started as an affair: he started dating his current wife while he was married to his previous wife. (source)

    yet another example of every accusation being a confession.

    • Timmy_Jizz_Tits@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Missing little nugget on this. His current wife, ex mistress, was a producer in his show. Copy/pasted from Wikipedia: “Noelle filed for divorce in 2018 after Watters admitted to an affair with a producer on his show, Emma DiGiovine. Watters claimed to have begun dating DiGiovine by letting the air out of her vehicle’s tires so she would ask him for a ride.”

      Funking all caps CREEP.

      • affiliate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        it’s (somehow) even creepier when you hear how he describes it:

        “When I was trying to get [my wife Emma] to date me, first thing I did, uh, I let the air out of her tires,” Watters claimed, pleased with himself. “She couldn’t go anywhere, she needed a lift. I said, ‘Hey, you need a lift?’ She hopped right in the car.” (source)

    • rayyy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      he started dating his current wife while he was married to his previous wife

      Traditional Republican values today.

  • Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Oh, many of them are. They are right to be afraid. Everything makes these gamma males afraid, though. Climate change, the empowerment of women, people who disagree with them.

    They are gentler than snowflakes, they are cold breezes in a world that’s steadily warming. And they know it. They fear the future, no matter what happens. They fear change.

    • pigup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s as if they want to conserve the status quo. We should call them “conservationists”!