(I know many of you already know it but this incident I experienced made me so paranoid about using smartphones)

To start off, I’m not that deep into privacy rabbit hole but I do as much I can possibly to be private on my phone. But for the rest of phones in my family, I generally don’t care because they are not tech savvy and pushing them towards privacy would make their lives hard.

So, the other day I pirated a movie for my family and since it was on Netflix, it was a direct rip with full HD. I was explaining to my family how this looks so good as this is an direct rip off from the Netflix platform, and not a recording of a screening in a cinema hall(camrip). It was a small 2min discussion in my native language with only English words used are record, piracy and Netflix.

Later I walk off and open YouTube, and I see a 2 recommendations pop-up on my homepage, “How to record Netflix shows” & “Why can’t you screen record Netflix”. THE WHAT NOW. I felt insanely insecure as I was sure never in my life I looked this shit up and it was purely based on those words I just spoke 5min back.

I am pretty secure on my device afaik and pretty sure all the listening happened on other devices in my family. Later that day, I went and saw which all apps had microphone access, moved most of them to Ask everytime and disabled Google app which literally has all the permissions enabled.

Overall a scary and saddening experience as this might be happening to almost everyone and made me feel it the journey I took to privacy-focused, all worth it.

  • Boomkop3@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago
    • A family member might have searched it
    • An ad network might have reported on your piracy (especially now with privacy sandbox)
    • Your media player might just be doing some tracking and/or insecure searching for metadata
    • Siri or something might have popped open
    • You googled to get to the piracy website
    • You may have just looked up the movie, and the movie was popular with pirates

    Don’t get too paranoid

  • Matt@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Root your phone and degoogle it if it doesn’t have LineageOS image. If it does have LineageOS image, then flash it. Oh, and don’t use Google and YouTube. Use Brave/Vivaldi for web search and Tubular for YouTube.

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Person in a privacy community using YouTube and multiple Google accounts thinks the only way they are being tracked is through phone microphones…you can’t make this shit up.

    • zerozaku@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      As I have already mentioned in the post, I am not that deep into privacy rabbit hole that I am completely degoogled my life. If I did, I wouldn’t have any privacy concerns to begin with ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

      On why I haven’t done it yet is simply because it is extremely hard. If you go full privacy-focused, you lose out on convience and vice versa. I’d like to stay in balance.

      • Ilandar@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        You focused on the wrong part of my comment. The issue isn’t that you have Google accounts or use YouTube, it’s that you seem to have very little understanding of how much data is being collected about you through these avenues. Instead you focus on some conspiracy theory about phone microphones which is still yet to be proven despite years of technologically illiterate people telling us that “the only way they could have known that is if they were listening to me!!!”. I don’t understand how you get to the point of posting in a niche privacy community whilst still being so completely clueless and misinformed.

        • zerozaku@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I was in the same belief that phones do not listen to our mics for years until that news of Facebook employees leaked chat came out.

          • Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Let’s assume the incident you referred is true. It’s still not the phone microphone that’s doing it, it’s the spyware/adware/malware app you installed from play store.

            Solution? Degoogle and stay away from tech giants like meta, apple, etc. Use opens source alternatives.

            If you are still paranoid, Android 13 and onwards, whenever your cam/mic is being used, you can see a green microphone or camera logo on the status bar top right.

          • Ilandar@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            What are you referring to? I searched for this and the results were just the CMG story. That wasn’t even proof that the technology existed, let alone was being used.

      • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Exactly, it is “A community of privacy and FOSS enthusiasts, run by Lemmy’s developers,” and not a community for spreading nonsense like Google secretly listening to your conversations to better recommend YouTube videos to you.

  • ganymede@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Anyone saying they know for 100% certain it’s not happening is probably speaking from their emotional desire for it not to be true - rather than actual fact.

    Anyone who has looked into the actual technical aspects, rather than spouting the usual surface-level “tech facts” or parroting headlines (rather than the actual academic findings), cannot seriously claim to know for certain its 100% not happening.

    @op i would advise caution on stating ‘24x7’ until there is evidence of that specific claim. (unless you’re referring to while voice assistants are enabled.)

    • zerozaku@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I am surprised by the response I got from majority here. I thought the people who are privacy-focused, wouldn’t give the benefit of doubt to Google of all companies. But it isn’t the case here. Everyone here just assumes and believes strongly it isn’t technically not possible which is really the case when you look at the other services offered by Google.

      @op i would advise caution on stating ‘24x7’ until there is evidence of that specific claim. (unless you’re referring to while voice assistants are enabled.)

      Google app which is pre-installed is pretty a forced voice assistant on everyone on android.

      • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        I get your feeling :) Don’t worry the silent majority is on your side. However they won’t comment because they fear from being banned or backslashed…

        While It can’t be proven or disapproven, I also had my share of strange coincidence where my mind goes “Huh? How is that even possible?”… Kinda strange feeling! But that feeling gave me the push to the privacy route maybe in a rather to extreme direction? Always follow your guts when there’s to much noise to make a clear decision.

        • RethinkDNS (block every in/out request except those manually allowed)
        • Degoogles android (Shizuku+canta, magisk, debloater)
        • Only open source apps and delete everything else (no exceptions here) -…

        You will never get full 100% privacy or anonymity, however you can make your data as much as difficult to get and waste some of their resource and time :).

        Good luck !

          • ganymede@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            cos the majority in this thread cannot even read the articles they cite mistakenly thinking it supports their unscientific claims that this topic is decided.

            afaict no researcher has formally claimed a full coverage binary analysis.

            if you know of such a study please link?

            afaict the researchers are very upfront about the limits to the coverage of their studies and the importance of that uncovered ground being covered.

            when the researchers themselves are saying the work isn’t over. why are all the super geniuses in this thread so smugly announcing this topic is wrapped up?

            i guess they know better than the actual researchers do. amazing, someone should tell them not to worry cos the geniuses in the forums have it all worked out 🤣

            [if you’re unable to reply with a direct excerpt from actual formally issued research (not some pop media headline) i will not bother responding]

            • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Hahaha… What a stupid take. Yeah scientific research isn’t biased and hasn’t been poisoned by conflict of interest… never has been and never will I guess? Scientific research is the ultimate truth of wisdom and you don’t need your own critical thinking anymore 😮‍💨 (Yeah the tobacco industry was right, smoking is healthy !)

              when the researchers themselves are saying the work isn’t over. why are all the super geniuses in this thread so smugly announcing this topic is wrapped up?

              It’s better to be safe than sorry

              Edit:

              Therefore, the fact that no evidence for large-scale mobile eavesdropping has been found so far should not be interpreted as an all-clear. It could only mean that it is difficult – under current circumstances perhaps even impossible – to detect such attacks effectively.

              https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-22479-0_6

              Scientific enough?

      • ganymede@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        yeah the level of technical competence on this site has plummeted since the influx of the reddit crowd.

        just enough consumer tech enthusiast knowledge to delude themselves they can smugly and self righteously shit on the average non-tech person.

        and now they’re the majority, drowning out legitimate curiosity by loudly parroting headlines from articles they didn’t even read. slowly turning lemmy into the regurgitated reddit pop media shithole they wanted to escape.

        this topic is especially difficult because of the clear emotional desire for it not to be true. hence the degree of fragile cope in this thread.

        thankfully not everyone here is a lost cause, and you’ve been given some good advice on delineating the other possible causes for what you’ve observed. when we do a careful analysis we must ofc consider all possibilities.

        what i’ve not seen properly acknowledged in this thread, however, is that the possibility of alternative explanations doesn’t preclude the possibility of voice-based surveillance either.

        • zerozaku@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 days ago

          this topic is especially difficult because of the clear emotional desire for it not to be true. hence the degree of fragile cope in this thread

          Well said.

  • TheFriar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yup. I was driving in the car with a few people for work. We were talking about a music video a couple of us had worked on, and we were explaining who daddy yankee/bad bunny was, and we mentioned daddy yankee did the song “gasolina.”

    We live in the US, the conversation was in English, but fuck if “estacion de gasolina” didn’t show up on our route.

  • otp@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Yet again, someone mistakes an anecdote for evidence. And evidence is also not the plural form of anecdote.

    I’m sure we have people here who are tech-savvy enough to have actually examined the kinds of data that their phone is sharing.

    If you have something like Google Home or Amazon Alexa, then yeah, those would be sending voice data back, and yeah, they could probably use it for advertising. But as far as I know, there is no evidence that phones are “always listening” and “always sending information back” when they’re idle.

  • ShortN0te@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    And how often. have you said stuff that you have not received advertising for? You will notice it when you get a positive match but not on a negative.

    Data collecting companies can predict/rate your behavior for more then 20 years based. Since then. it has been perfected. They know that you are interested in those topics without having the need to waste resources on recording and analyzing every single audio stream.

  • bad_news@lemmy.billiam.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    It’s possible that it’s inferred off the digital footprint of you pirating the content, also. People freak out a lot about being listened to, but I’d argue that’s an inefficient spying mechanism they probably don’t lean heavily on if they can avoid it. We’re all living on platforms that are knowably spying on everything you click on or read or do online and feeding that into giant AI models with everything about you. Like just by watching a pirated video on a Google TV device, Google’s hashing that and phoning that data home, possibly even matching that to the specific file, and adding that to an ad profile.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Listening to audio would be the least effective and most expensive method of data collection for advertisers. It’s not happening. They already have literally over a million data points on you, there’s nothing useful for them to glean from your audio that they don’t already have ad nauseum.

    You see thousands of ads and recommendations every day. You finally found one that was relevant to you. It’s not that deep.

  • xionzui@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    I’ve gotten ads for things I’ve just thought about. Never said anything out loud about or did any searches related to. It was something in a video I’ve watched dozens of videos about in the past. But on this occasion, I happened to think that I kind of want one for the first time. And I just so happened to start getting ads for them right after, also for the first time. They know way more about you than you think and don’t need to listen to you.

  • edric@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    No, your phone doesn’t listen to you 24/7. With that out of the way, there are a number of places where youtube may have gotten that info. One possibility is that someone in your household looked up the movie and maybe checked if stuff ripped from netflix is indeed full HD. And since everyone in your family is using the same NAT IP, then it’s easy for youtube to target recommendations at everyone in that household.

    • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t doubt you, but it’s worth asking if your reasons for stating that our phones don’t listen to us 24/7 haven’t changed since you first formed the opinion.

      Lots of things are meso-facts (a true fact at rhetorical time we learn it, but no longer true later). Tech moves quickly. It’s worth not assuming anyone is right here, & asking: under what conditions could our phones be listening (enough to produce what OP experienced)?

        • beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          But again, what I’m getting at here is, are we so sure it takes all that much anymore. Processing could take place in a shorter way now, more than it could when our current opinion was still true.

      • edric@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        The conditions would be that all the controls that are in place to prevent it from happening are bypassed, which no one has proven yet. For example, Apple has developed their devices (assuming not jailbroken) in such a way where the camera and microphone usage indicators are hardwired and can’t easily be bypassed by software hacks. So if your phone was listening to you all the time, then the microphone indicator light would always be on. Listening 24/7 would also drain the phone’s battery and use up so much data it would be noticeable. Another example is Siri. It is actually designed in a way where there are 2 components. The first one is local on the phone and separate from the actual Siri component. It is what’s actively listening for you to call it. Once you call it, it then activates the actual Siri that transmits your voice inputs online.

        • zerozaku@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          People saying it hurts battery usage, sends crazy amounts of network etc don’t seem to use the latest features from Google.

          Now playing, Adaptive audio are some features of android system that Google has given in recent years which listen to our microphones all the time and serve their purpose. I have used them in the past, although it said it consumes battery, I never experienced huge battery brain. Google also says these services work on device and never leaves the device, but I assume extracting few words from my audio and sending them to their servers at frequent times wouldn’t be such a technically demanding process like everyone are stating here on this post. It entirely possible and probably happening.

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 days ago

        Watchdog groups have been monitoring these services for years now and have yet to find the “your phone is listening 24/7” smoking gun.

  • TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    Here’s a fun little experiment you can try. Make a list of random topics and have a discussion about each of them on separate days. Make sure each topic is something that could result in creepy suggestions or ads on YT. If even one of these topics produces the expected result, you could be on to something.

    • otp@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Fun, sure, but not an experiment that would actually be meaningful.

      The data from your phone’s microphone doesn’t magically appear in Google’s advertising servers. It would have to go through a lot of steps before it gets there, and one of the first steps is in your home (if you’re on WiFi). One can analyze the traffic/data that leaves their phone.

      It’s good to be cautious, but worrying about your phone’s microphone is potentially like worrying about your windows while leaving your front door open.

  • Lojcs@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 days ago

    These kinds of things never happen to me, could it be because I have all the tracking stuff disabled?? /s