• pdxfed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m in HR and think about this a lot; it’s (mostly) a marker of poorly run companies when they say experience in software X is required. Mostly these pets are using one of several software solutions and by saying a candidate must have experience in a specific software means the company is brittle; can’t train, wants to hire non-thinkers and learners, and also likely isn’t looking ahead at what will change in the future.

    Software change will only accelerate likely, so hire learners.

    • Sabata@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      It jobs:

      Need 10 years experience in 1 year old tech

      Or

      Need 10 years experience in tech that stopped existing 10 years ago.

      Or

      Need 10 years experience in this software that is a felony to use outside our business and the government.

      • slazer2au@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The best one I saw was someone going for a job with a company that uses a particular platform stack. He didn’t get the job with the company saying you don’t have enough experience with said platform.
        Except he wrote the platform.

        • _thisdot@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Never heard of this one tbh. The creator of homebrew was rejected at Google when he failed to implement a basic algorithm. The people interviewing him were using the software he wrote. But tbf, if you’re applying at Google they expect you to be able to invert a binary tree