He’s backed against a corner and lashing out. Scared little man.
The share of words associated with violence rose from almost 0.6% in 2016 to 1.6% in 2024 in Trump’s speeches. As a comparison, the proportion of violent words in 40 randomly chosen weekly radio addresses by Barack Obama was 0.79%
Obama more violent than 2016 Trump confirmed. /s
No shit, we’ve all BEEN here the whole time, we’ve watched this unfold
But people in 100 years will need to reference articles that show this for the history books. Its important work to publish these things.
don’t underestimate the frog in hot water effect. it can make it hard for some people to notice the dramatic increase if they aren’t paying close attention. it helps fascists gain power
I’ve got loads of respect for anyone willing to sift through 9 years of Trump speeches without turning insane.
Id feel sorry for anyone who did this manually when it is a relatively simple sentiment analysis project the can be done programmatically. The hardest part would be sourcing the transcripts or audio files (which then could be transcribed programmatically)
They probably forced some poor, innocent algorithm to do it
Maybe this is how Skynet happened
Added to the pile of everything else we’re shoveling it. I prefer Ultron’s take on things seconds after its birth.
And it would be justified
smells like desperation. if he doesnt win, hes got quite a few court appearances to answer to.
I still don’t get how we ignored our own constitution and allowed insurectionist to have a second chance.
WTF America?
Bc pwn libs.
And it’ll happen again if given a quarter of a chance. Get voting!
Because presidents are kings now thanks to the supreme court.
If our king displayed behavior anywhere close to how Trump behaves, it would’ve been the end of monarchy in Norway, and indeed any other modern monarchy.
Merrick Garland’s fecklessness will go in the history books—that is if they are not all burned by the MAGA Nazis
Milquetoast.
His name is Milquetoast.
Neville Garland.
The Conversation - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Conversation:
Wiki: reliable - The Conversation publishes articles from academics who are subject-matter experts. It is generally reliable for subjects in the authors’ areas of expertise. Opinions published in The Conversation should be handled with WP:RSOPINION.
MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - Australia
Search topics on Ground.News
