• SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    trying to please everyone has never been a seriously effective Democratic strategy, especially in the long term.

    Do you think it would be more effective to piss off people? Maybe she could start telling us which voters she thinks are “deplorable”? Is that more effective than trying to please as many voters as possible?

    The Dems have won three out of the last four elections. Not sure why you’re saying this strategy is not effective given the one they lost was the one where their candidate called some voters deplorable.

    Waltz was a great addition, but the campaign hid him away the second Harris took on most of Hillary’s campaign advisors.

    The VP candidate is not supposed to overshadow the Presidential candidate. Walz has been on the campaign trail basically non-stop, and doing local interviews which may actually be more important than national interviews. The national media doesn’t pick up on things Walz is doing all the time, but don’t confuse that with the campaign hiding him away. Harris’ debate performance and national interviews are much stronger than Walz’s debate performance on the national stage. So why would they be trying to push a guy to do national interviews that he’s not great at instead of doing rallies and local interviews which he is good at?