• galileopie@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    But if each corporation forked their own kernel, after a few years of customizing the code to their needs, they would each be developing their own operaging system so all software would only run on company systems and would not be compatible with customer’s systems.

    • t3rmit3@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      No, their derivatives are not running on top of another person’s OS, they are themselves the OS. Hardware doesn’t make itself compatible with Linux, Linux makes itself compatible with hardware (by using or creating drivers). Those other companies do as well (or own the hardware stack as well, like Cisco).

      • galileopie@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        My argument is if Linux goes AGPL3 which causes each company to fork the last GPL2 release, than after a few years of each company maintaining their own forked version, they will each evolve into their own operating system designed for their corporate software rather than all coporations using a single operating system that each develop their software to run on that OS.

        But if they choose to develop on top of BSD then they will never be constricted by meaningless pointless software license.

        I am an ISC supremaist for the sake of individual liberty.