• BlueZen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    corruption yes, but what’s to stop an organized group, having one member refer the other hundred members, split the money, then not vote the way the pledge is implying they should. (democrats do support the Constitution, some could argue more than the maga lip service)

    . * wink *

    not saying anyone should do it… purely theoretical thought experiment

    . * wink wink *

  • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I live in a swing state. Are we saying I could offer registered voters $20 for their signatures and turn a profit?

    • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Weeeeellllllllll does your bank account have seemingly 10000 lifetimes worth of money? That’ll tell you if it’s legal or not for you to do it.

    • andros_rex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Southern states have had their judiciary replaced with incompetents and yes-men. Regulatory agencies in many states are entirely broken.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re paying people to collect signatures… not for the signatures themselves. This is specifically allowed in most (all?) states for organizations to be able to pay people a wage to spend the time collecting signatures for ballot initiatives. Most states require the person collecting signatures to be registered with the state if they are being paid however. So unless they’re doing that and sponsoring and registering every person collecting these signatures with the State, they are likely still violating the law there. Volunteer unpaid circulators don’t have to be registered, but if you’re getting paid for it, you’re probably required to be registered to an organization that’s responsible for what you do.

      Note: This is usually done via a standard hourly wage, or a price per sheet of good signatures. Many sigs (I’ve seen 1/3 to 1/2) are thrown out because the requirements are extremely strict for processing. A good signature or sheet of signatures can be completely invalidated by an error made by the person collecting it, or because it’s on a page with the wrong county listed (even though every signature line also requires an address to verify). Simple errors unrelated to signatures get entire pages thrown out.

      Source: Was trained and registered as a paid petition circulator with the State of Arizona earlier this year.

      • Digital_man@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wow , really appreciate this answer.

        The whole thing to me is unsettling because of how gamified and crowd sourced it is. As if it’s some sort of gofundme page

        • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Oh it definitely skirts the line.

          https://apps.azsos.gov/apps/election/circulatorportal/

          Pursuant to Arizona Law (A.R.S. § 19-118; A.R.S. § 16-321; A.R.S. § 19-205.01), a circulator must register with the Secretary of State’s Office if the circulator:

          1. is not a resident of this state and will circulate candidate petitions, recall petitions, or statewide initiative or referendum petitions,
          2. is paid to circulate recall petitions, statewide initiative or referendum petitions (whether or not the circulator is a resident of this state).

          Thinking about it more, and looking more into what’s actually being done however… this doesn’t appear to an official petition of any kind as far as I can see. It’s basically a petition.org page, and just as useless. And they’re paying people for it. Free money to sign people up for unlimited bullshit emails and junk mail from the MAGA team forever.

          Also, it seems this tweet was deleted? I can’t find it on Elon’s page anymore, unless it’s just their bullshit algorithm putting other shit on top now instead of being obviously chronological.

    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Oh it is. It’s just that Trump is doing SO much illegal shit, he’s overloading our system of law to the point where it can’t keep up anymore.

      He won’t live long enough for our system to prosecute him for everything- so he’s going for broke.

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Same in Hungary, where anti-hate speech laws are only being enforced seldom, and the last such incident was due to an opposition politician saying “heterosexual white christian man” on TV, while the now doxxed editors of kuruc info can still deny the holocaust on their foreign hosted webshite, that is also being partly funded by a Florida Republican (of course).

        • ochi_chernye@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I heard a really depressing podcast the other day about all the cooperation between Republicans and Orban. They’re well on their way to destroying democracy here as well.

  • sudo42@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Nah, it’s corruption only when poor people do it. When rich people do it it’s just “smart business”.

  • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Same republicans froth at their mouth because “DeMoCraTS aRE BuSinG VoTErs!!!” without even a shred of proof

  • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wait. I get paid $47 to refer a friend to sign a petition to get bombarded with MAGA bullshit? Good thing. I am capable of making “real” good friends in swing states. I imagine they won’t be bothered with getting spam emails.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not sure it breaks any laws, but I love how they show how slow the process would be. The election would be over before any of it mattered, and if Trump won, it’s federal so he could pardon any of it.

      See below. It would take minimum 50 days just to start the process… Which isn’t even anything but letters at that point.

      “Notice to respondents Within five days after receiving a proper complaint, OGC sends each respondent a copy of the complaint and a description of the Commission’s compliance procedures. The respondent has 15 days from the date of receipt to respond in writing, explaining why no action should be taken. In the case of a complaint that does not satisfy the requirements, the respondent nevertheless receives a copy of the complaint and an explanation that the complainant has 15 days to correct the complaint. If the complainant corrects and refiles the complaint, the respondent is sent a copy of the corrected complaint and is given 15 days to submit a response to the Commission.”

      • Dr. Dabbles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Paying people for votes is very much against the law. And Trump’s shitty behavior doesn’t really mean Elon’s bullshit shouldn’t be reported. You think Trump’s going to pardon these morons for their participation? He pardoned two cabinet/campaign members from his original bid for office rather than the reelection debacle, both of which were from the Mueller investigation. He pardoned none of the co-conspirators for his 2020 re-election antics. Trump only does favors for people that are valuable to him, and Elon’s worthless for anything but his money and his access to the raw twitter firehose.

  • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I bet my home on that “free speech” means “people cannot call us racist for calling black people the N-word” in this case…

  • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    What does it mean to register in America? If you’re registered as democrat, what does that mean?

    • SoJB@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      American elections are not actually elections, they are private decisions made by Party Committees and votes are just a suggestion by the “constituents”.

      Each party privately selects their own candidate to run, independent of the voters’ will, and then the actual “government” election run by the government is where those privately selected agents get to duke it out in public.

      As always, liberal accusations of “authoritarian” socialist states are just another confession. The DNC plays this game the same way the RNC does.

      What other logical explanation is there for the lack of universal public healthcare, education, social safety net, Roe v Wade not being codified into law, PATRIOT act, Glass Steagall repeal, 2008 bank bailout, SLABS imploding the economy, illegitimate Supreme Court, RBG and Pelosi holding onto power until they are literal corpses, 6 million dead civilians in the Middle East, 200,000 dead Palestinians, women’s and LGBT rights being stripped away with literally zero federal pushback, committing state sponsored terrorism on Cuba for a century, the list goes on forever.

      All done with wholehearted and enthusiastic DNC complicity.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Only registered Democrats can vote in a Democratic primary election, where the Democratic party selects its candidates for a general election.

      Only registered Republicans can vote in a Republican primary election, where the Republican party selects its candidates for a general election.

      Party registration plays no role in a General election: you can vote for anyone, even if they are not a member of your own party.

      Voter registration (as opposed to party registration) is simply a declaration of your residency and thus eligibility to vote in elections at the state, county, city, congressional district, school district, ward, and possibly even lower level elections. (Three homeowners on my small, dead-end dirt road are the only ones eligible to “vote” on whether a special tax should be assessed against our properties to pave our road. )

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        That’s so weird to me because it seems to me like is eliminates vote secrecy. I mean, not literally but it must be pretty rare that someone registered as X votes for Y.

        I suppose this exists in my country to some extent. Only registered members of the party vote for internal elections. But my country is smaller, as are the parties, and there are more of them.

      • Dalvoron@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Can you register with both parties? Choose the best candidate for your party in your primary and the worst viable candidate for the other one?

        • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope. Primary elections are held simultaneously, and you are only allowed one ballot or the other. But it is a common practice to “sabotage” the other party rather than vote for your own.

          • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            But you can still only request a ballot with one primary: you cannot select the best candidate for your party and the worst for the other.

            In those states, the request for a particular ballot is, effectively, registering as a member of that party.

  • Lord Wiggle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand why Elon is fighting for free speech while at the same time banning people on his platform for saying certain words like cis, anything leftist and anyone saying anything bad about him. When Elon is so pro free speech, why not stop the censorship on his own platform?

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      My friend, Elon is not fighting for free speech. It’s not just him, but because he owns that company, it looks extra bad when he shows his own hypocrisy. Many Washington Democrats and Republicans wish they could censor anyone they disagree with. They only pretend to support the First Amendment when it’s something that backs their agenda.

      Also, for someone like him, being hypocritical is a virtue. He’s signaling to potential allies that he’s willing to ignore the rules if they would inconvenience him and his friends.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Conservatives are passionate about “free speech” because “free speech” is much more politically viable than “calling people slurs”.