• blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    nar. HDDs don’t require power to maintain their state. So that’s an advantage they’ll always have over SSDs, which means there will be use-cases where HDDs are the better choice.

    • JamesFire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      HDDs don’t require power to maintain their state. So that’s an advantage they’ll always have over SSDs

      SSDs are not flash memory.

    • Allero@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      SSDs can reliably hold charge states for years, and there are storage media that are more reliable than HDD.

      HDD’s would still find a niche, probably, as a balanced option, but said niche will likely get smaller and smaller over many years.

      • Cethin@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        HDDs will probably always be useful for media storage, where quick access time isn’t required and it isn’t being used constantly. They should die for PCs though.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Exactly. I haven’t used a HDD in my PC for years, yet I bought HDDs for my homelab NAS. Unless SSDs get a lot cheaper, I’ll keep buying HDDs for on-prem bulk storage.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It will probably be a choice of quieter, faster, expensive vs loud, high capacity, pretty cheap.

        Unless we start with 3.5" SSDs (pls), HDDs will always be storage kings.
        Imagine 3.5" SSDs with 3-4 layer sandwiched PCBs…And inexpensive NAND…

        • Allero@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Why is 3.5" preferable? You can always use a 2.5" to 3.5" adapter, and even 2.5" casing is mostly empty anyway

          • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            More volume for more NAND-PCBs

            and even 2.5" casing is mostly empty anyway

            Does this count for the higher capacity drives (e.g. >2TB)? Preferably TLC?

            • Allero@lemmy.today
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              30 days ago

              Proud owner of 1TB Samsung 860 Evo.

              Pretty much yes, it counts :D

              Moreover, iirc, there are 64TB 2,5" SSDs and 100TB 3,5" available for enterprise users, and 8TB M.2 SSDs on consumer market. Space is really not a constraint.