• EdanGrey@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Mate, please go outside and touch grass. Your post history is concerning and honestly I’m wondering if you’ve ever actually spoken to a woman.

  • Asudox@programming.devM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I consider abortion the same as murder with only two exceptions: her life was in danger or she got raped.

    So if she had an abortion and it wasn’t because of her life being in danger or because of rape, then no, I wouldn’t want to be with such a woman.

    • BigDotNet@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      Español
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      Pretty reasonable in my opinion, there are people who it’s against even when it’s rape but definitely I’m agree with it only when sex was non-consensual because at this point of society decostruction(destruction?) I can’t imagine how much rape allegations are false.

  • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If my wife didn’t have an abortion, she would be fucking dead by now, so how would that even be a consideration that a sane person would make? Does an abortion make a woman less of a person? No. But does it make her less loveable? Also no. But is it a red flag that she had sex before, maybe even with a different person? No, and fuck patriarchy.

    • BigDotNet@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      Español
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I think my question it’s poorly framed, I was talking more about women who use abortion like a contraceptive, some of them with more than 1 abortion.

      • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No one uses it as a contraceptive. Look up how the procedure takes place, the impacts on their lives and even just the cost. No one would put themselves through that by choice over actual alternatives. It’s just crazies spewing that filth tryjng to get people to look down on women and shame them when they are vulnerable.

        Anyone who spews such nonsense is just vile. If someone chose to use it would mean there was a failure in parents, failure in educators, abusers in their life, and likely they need help. Not someone to put them down.

        • BigDotNet@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          Español
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I believe the problem it’s people didn’t talk enough about this stuff, It isn’t something people usually talk about, even women.

  • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Honestly I’d be more relieved that there isn’t an ex in the picture she’s tied to via the kid!

  • Steve@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Since every single other comment says no, and I love debate, so I will say yes, because its her buisiness that should have been kept private. The fact that I know about it is a red flag.

    • LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Note to self, if I ever need someone to rely on, or confide in during a time of hardship, don’t talk to Steve or anyone who may ever talk to Steve. Why should a hardship need to be private, unless you look down on them?

  • Badabinski@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Nope, it would have no bearing on my decision-making process. Not my body, not my womb, not my fucking business.