• Alph4d0g@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    We might be headed toward the same conditions that spawned the French revolution. I’m not in favor of that but once the wealth transfer gets to a certain point there’s historical president to draw upon.

    • Soup@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      That isn’t going to happen. And in the very off chance that it does- the government is guaranteed the win, and the people will suffer.

      Greatly.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        The government is made of people. Those people might refuse to do their jobs too.

        A protest is SUBSTANTIALLY more likely to happen than the original suggestion of charging state lawmakers with murder. There’s no murder charge that would qualify.

        • JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Reckless endangerment and manslaughter.

          They were warned that women would die due these laws and they didn’t listen. They recklessly put those laws there and people died… resulting in manslaughter.

          I’d prefer homicide too, but I feel like manslaughter charges would stick better because you don’t have to prove intent, just that someone died because of their actions.

        • Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          10 days ago

          Riiiiight. Well, have fun storming the castle. Just don’t make a mess on my street, okay? I don’t want to have to clean that shit up.

          • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            10 days ago

            Protest is a range of actions. Including things like boycott, self immolation, letter writing, emails, phone calls.

            I already know you don’t want to be inconvenienced by doing the right thing or even thinking about what is actually achievable. Charging lawmakers with murder isn’t achievable because there’s no legal basis for it. Like literally none. So have fun being a coward ig

            • Soup@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              10 days ago

              And there it is! Internet activists calling people they know nothing about “cowards”. Typical lemmy rhetoric.

              You’re going to have to forgive me if I walk away from this conversation having felt a touch of second-hand embarrassment for you. That’s just me being me.

              I’m just empathic that way.

                • Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  10 days ago

                  Yeah…. Hey bud- you don’t get to insult people, and then call them out for not playing your shit-tier little games.

                  That’s not how things work with adults.

                  • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 days ago

                    I wouldn’t say I insulted you, more like described. You yourself said you’d sit inside while people protested women’s deaths, and hoped you wouldn’t be inconvenienced by it. Is that not an act of cowardice?