Arthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days ago"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-link"participants who had access to an AI assistant wrote significantly less secure code" and "were also more likely to believe they wrote secure code" - 2023 Stanford University study published at CCS23arxiv.orgArthur Besse@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 3 days agomessage-square35fedilink
minus-squareNauticalNoodle@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-23 days agoIt seems to me that if one can adequately explain the function of their pseudocode in adequate detail for an LLM to turn it into a functional and reliable program, then the hardest part of writing the code was already done without the LLM.
It seems to me that if one can adequately explain the function of their pseudocode in adequate detail for an LLM to turn it into a functional and reliable program, then the hardest part of writing the code was already done without the LLM.