• YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I wonder Ozma, what would you have the US do?

    (This is for OP, others need not reply)

  • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Protesting in a war zone of a foreign country on the side that started it and knowing how Israel is executing a genocide is a whole new level of stupid.

      • InternetUser2012@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t support any genocide. I support a cease fire/peace treaty, something you don’t seem to understand or support, but narrative amirite?

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I don’t support any genocide. I support a cease fire/peace treaty, something you don’t seem to understand or support, but narrative amirite?

          As long as we keep selling Netanyahu weapons, he will continue committing genocide. He’ll keep stringing us along by making positive cooing noises about wanting peace, and then yank the football away at the last moment.

          You want to keep pursuing something that you know will never work. Netanyahu isn’t interested in peace. He’s interested in continuing the genocide that keeps him in power.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Do you know how many Americans the US government kills in the US? Why would they give a shit about one more far away?

    Lol.

    • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think people forget that cops are part of the government and they definitely kill innocent people.

  • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Americans are upset, just politicians are afraid to lose their annual bribes if they talk outside of church.

    • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      The other side gives bribes too. The only difference is that Israel has a stronger lobby and a bigger pot to finance their payoffs.

      This will never end until we get the money out of politics.

      • 4_degrees@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Wait, what’s the other side that pays folks to free Palestine? Honest question, because if they exist, they sure are doing a shit job.

    • 4lan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Would you be saying the same thing if the insurrectionists were mowed down by the national guard on Jan 6?

      Ashli Babbitt got what she had coming. Play stupid games win stupid prizes, right?

      Or is that different somehow because she was a righty?

      You idiots are going to have to FAFO the hard way. Go ahead and try again when Trump loses, we have a president that will deploy the national guard and open fire on you terrorists

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That policy doesn’t seem to apply to people living in Russia, or even travelling to North Korea.

  • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Funny that just last week an American was shot in the head, executed by Hamas, and there wasn’t an Intercept article mentioning it. Maybe it’s just not fashionable to be outraged about it, and it wouldn’t get enough clicks.

    • nednobbins@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s outrageous. We should immediately stop funding Hamas.

      No more weapons packages.
      No more military funding.
      The Gerald R. Ford Carrier Strike Group should stop supporting them now.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      People expect terrorists to shoot innocent people in the head. They don’t accept it when people claiming to fight terrorists shoot innocent people in the head.

      • CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ask a Palestinian in the West Bank if they think Hamas are terrorists or freedom fighters.

        “Terrorist” is a thought-terminating cliche.

        Both Israel and Hamas are religious extremists who exploit and murder innocent civilians. Neither one is worthy of our aid or our defense. Send aid to the poor people caught in the middle of this shit and stop sending weapons.

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          The question isn’t why Palestinians aren’t reporting on Hamas killing someone, the question is why isn’t the West reporting on it.

          Hamas killing someone is expected behavior.

        • nednobbins@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          Weapons. That’s the connection.

          The US sends vast arsenals to Israel and Israel uses those weapons for genocide and other war crimes.

            • nednobbins@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              If you look hard enough you can always find a nit to pick.

              When there are billions of dollars of heavy weapons pounding the entire area to dust, it’s completely disingenuous to talk about who paid for a particular bullet or gun.

              The entire operation is heavily subsidized by US military donations.

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                A rational person would surmise that if the weapon wasn’t US supplied she would have been shot in any case and weapons supplied by the US has nothing to do with the fact this is not about US politics.

                But, the outrage machine doesn’t look at facts.

                They simply deal with hyperbolic nonsense, like your last sentance.

                • nednobbins@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  A rational person would take the information in context. The shooter was not acting in isolation. The shooter was part of an organized military that is heavily subsidized by the US government.

                  What’s hyperbolic about the last sentence? It’s an easily demonstrated fact that the US sends billions of dollars in military aid to Israel. It’s an easily verified fact that this is a large portion of Israel’s military budget.

    • acargitz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Are you actually claiming there was no media coverage of the murdered hostages?

      There is a very good argument that the role of non mainstream news sources, like the Intercept, it to shed light on the news that mainstream media doesn’t raise.

      If the CNN was blasting 24 hours the news about this American being shot, I’m pretty sure the Intercept would not bother either.

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Just an observation on the nature of media and events. The Intercept is hardly mainstream. Instead of reporting facts it produces outrage purposed dribble, and this is a good example. In this case, those facts are not determined, and the US State Department is seeking them. That’s the way CNN reported it anyway. Should this turn into an Ashli Babbitt situation, the Intercept will not report it and it will not be here because it won’t suit the fashionable narrative.

        On a side note, I wonder what this story has to do with US Politics. Although I do see a mod in the string who should be able to explain that, but probably won’t

      • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I would hope that if you are any kind of US citizen, you would not be happy about it either. There are forest and trees, but you only see one.

        • 4lan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          We only fund one of these warring terrorist groups. Do not see that difference?

          Our taxes paid for the killing of a US citizen.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            So the Intercept is triggering you with this death for a purpose of government funding, while ignoring the other? IDK which is worse and it is what I said originally. Shame these young people died, but in one case we know what happened, but in this case we don’t.

            • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              We know exactly what happened, the US is just using delay tactics. Why are you upset that people are upset about the extrajudicial killing of an American Citizen by a foreign State. The IDF has killed so many American Citizens already, on top of you know, the genocide.

              American-Turkish human rights activist Aysenur Ezgi Eygi, 26, succumbed to her wounds on Friday after being shot in the head by Israeli forces during a weekly protest against settlement expansions in the West Bank, according to Palestinian Authority-run news outlet Wafa.

            • 4lan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              so you dont see the difference between us killing one of our own and someone else doing it?

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Both are dead.

                We didn’t kill anyone. We don’t know the facts, that’s why the US State Department is investigating.

                • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  US State Department is investigating waiting for idf to investigate.

                  It’s almost been a year of Israel indiscriminately killing in the area and the state department still refuses to do an investigation. Still waiting for Israel to investigate themselves.

                  But yeah sure. We’re totally gonna do something other than fund and supply weapons

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 months ago

              So the Intercept is triggering you with this death

              Just ignore it if it makes Netanyahu look bad!

        • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          I’m not. I’m also not cynically using it to whatabout in favor of a genocidal apartheid state like you’re doing.

          • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            All of a sudden by questioning the Intercept I’m support ING some state? That line of logic just doesn’t exist.

              • Rapidcreek@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                I was making mention of publishing one story and ignoring another. The Intercept only wants to trigger you, and it looks like they were successful

                • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  You were whining that the intercept isn’t running articles you would prefer to see and instead running articles you don’t want anyone to ever know about.

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    They responded to this in the past: https://travel.state.gov/content/travel/en/traveladvisories/traveladvisories/israel-west-bank-and-gaza-travel-advisory.html

    This kind of thing is entirely predictable and US citizens have been warned by the State Department about there being an active conflict happening in the area.

    So a US citizen died while ignoring a travel advisory from the US government. US citizenship doesn’t make someone invincible, and it doesn’t mean the US military is going to avenge your death (or whatever fantasy you can come up with) if you’re deliberately ignoring the warnings about an area of the world being dangerous. The obligation of protecting citizens was fulfilled by issuing the warning.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      There is no legal obligation to protect citizens. Is there an ethical obligation? Kind of no, for reasons you listed, but kind of yes, because the cause of death was predictable and it’s something in the US has partial control over.

      From a practical standpoint, we all agree that the US won’t do anything, because they certainly aren’t worried about pacifists in war zones where one of the sides is getting its weapons from the United States.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yeah a country has an ethical obligation to protect it’s citizens. Which is why countries issue travel advisories. If you ignore the warnings your country is giving you, that ethical obligation doesn’t apply because it was already fulfilled by the warning.

        “Don’t go over there, it’s dangerous!”

        “Screw you, I’m not listening to you!”

        Problem happens.

        “Why did you allow this dangerous thing to happen???”

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Although there are a bunch of ways the US can apply pressure. I think people overestimate the power ceasing weapon sales would have. While I believe it is the ethically right thing to do. It wouldn’t really hinder Israel’s ability to wage this war. It is allowing them to maintain their very vast stockpiles. But they could probably go years without even getting low, much less running out, without external weapons.