Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 days agoMaybe this is better for everyonelemmy.worldimagemessage-square463fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageMaybe this is better for everyonelemmy.worldRoflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 days agomessage-square463fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·17 days agoif i have food, throwing it away and getting more food is more expensive.
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 days agoThe paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·17 days agoright. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
minus-squarearchomrade [he/him]@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·17 days agoWhat they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·17 days ago What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.” Which is factually supported by the study …for a limited segment of the population.
if i have food, throwing it away and getting more food is more expensive.
The paper wasn’t discussing food stamp programs or even what food you might already have
right. it’s simply not scoped to support the claim tha being vegan is 30% cheaper
What they claimed was “a whole foods plant-based diet is 30% cheaper.”
Which is factually supported by the study, even if you’d prefer to interpret it to mean something else
…for a limited segment of the population.