• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Those programs are about mass surveillance and are wrapping themselves in the sheep wool of “protecting kids”

      • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        Why should they? Should every mail(physical or not) you receive be opened and read? Should the government have access to everything you do on your phone or pc? Should the government moderate your house? You are full 1984.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Even Facebook doesn’t allow CSAM in public profiles. You can’t just pull up Facebook and see that on your regular feed. Closed groups are a different story. Why should this be different?

          Mind you I’m not saying it the CEO should be criminally responsible for what users on the platform post. I’m pointing out that moderation is a thing even on some of the worst offenders in the space.

          • pressanykeynow@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            You didn’t answer my questions.

            What moderation do you want? And how would you prevent “moderation” from becoming censorship?

            Aren’t there people whose job is to prevent crimes? Why some IT person who has no idea of crime need to do their job?