• hedgehog@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Sorta turns the AD&D mechanic on its head. And it makes more sense than the way it was done in AD&D - I like it!

    Context: in AD&D, humans could “dual class,” which is similar to what you described - effectively retiring in one class and beginning to advance in another - and non-humans could “multi-class,” where they gained experience in two or more classes at the same time, leveling more slowly but getting the benefits of both classes.

    • redhorsejacket@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Further context, assuming the ruleset governing the OG Baldurs Gate games was true to the tabletop (I know they sort of kludged AD&D and aspects of 3e together). As the above said, a dual classed human “retires” their original class, and then begins to advance in their new class, essentially starting over from level 1, with only the hit dice and HP of their original class rolled over (you cannot access any of the class abilities you learned while advancing your original class). However, once your new class level is superior to your original class level, you can now access both skill sets.

      It’s a very strange system, and I am curious what the fluff reasons surrounding it are, if anyone has any insight into that edition.

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        I remember it being especially bizarre because it basically means going through a large portion of the game with a more or less useless character soaking up xp, after which you either have a slightly less useless underlevelled character or one that’s brokenly OP depending on how you planned out the combo. And if you dual class too late you just never get to that point and it’s all drawback no benefit.