• illi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      They need to make it nice first, to reel people in. Once they are in and invested, that’s when ads start.

      • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yep. that’s the classic shitty business model

        • Make a site that’s attractive to use for a lot of people

        • Once you have enough people, lock in the users with network effect, walled garden, etc

        • Use the users to draw in businesses

        • Lock in the businesses and squeeze them for profit.

        • Squeeze users and businesses for money, abandon any maintenance and improvement on the site except for monetization.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          It’s the 3 D’s.

          1. Develop the product
          2. Draw people in
          3. Dump a nice steamy log on the whole thing
      • Richard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I don’t understand this metaphor. Is it about frog breeding for later eating? Why else would you want to heat your pond, irrespective of the frog. And why is there a greater incentive to heat the pond when there’s no frog, and vice versa? So many questions!

        • Vanth@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I interpreted it as you don’t heat the pot while the frog is still in the pond. You only apply heat slowly once the front is already in the pot.

          Don’t load up the ads until the users are already on Threads. Wait until they are active on Threads, then crank up the ads when it’s more difficult for the users to leave.

        • Neshura@bookwormstory.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I guess the frog has to get into the pot first is their point? I agree that the metaphor is not doing a very good job at conveying whatever was meant though.