Hours after being convicted of tampering with voting machines in Colorado in the name of Donald Trump, former Mesa County clerk Tina Peters griped that the outcome was a “sad day for our nation and the world” while continuing to spout false election-related conspiracy theories about “vote-flipping software that is basically in Serbia.”

Peters was found guilty Monday on seven of ten charges after she granted unauthorized individuals access to county voting machines in order to transfer data to Trump allies. Peters faces up to 22 years in prison.

Later in the day, Peters responded to her newfound status as a felon by posting Bible quotes and spreading baseless claims about election fraud.

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Yeah, but not by much. I remember reports of garbage bags full of D ballots being found in the dumpsters at voting sites in rural areas during the Bush II years. I don’t ever remember any investigations about it.

    • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah you still not a robust auditing system with multiple layers of oversight, and oh, ya know, a federal electoral commission directly oversees every level.

      Also the fact voting rules are different per state for a federal election is insane.

      Being able to throw out votes should be harder in physical form, because you actually need to transport physical things.

      Hack a voting machine? Much more silent.

          • Jojo, Lady of the West@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            The biggest thing (which he even acknowledged) is that there are dimensions which favor electronic voting over physical. It’s not as simple as “physical is always better” or “never trust electronic voting” because sometimes making sure it’s even possible for everyone to vote is more important than other factors.

            Generally, in an election the size of the us presidential election, Tom Scott at least believes paper is heavily favored.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        I’m not saying that paper ballots aren’t more secure, but there wasn’t as much attention to being given to the questionable elections that got Bush elected. And yes, I do remember the “dimpled chads” in Florida. What I don’t remember was much coverage of the Brooks Brothers riot.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      or per the TV show Succession where there’s a fire in a voting office that swings the election (may be based on a true story)