• linearchaos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Interesting perspective. I never really thought about that. For a mammal to carry and protect its young it’s not that much of an energy sink. They eat food digest it and provide milk. Birds have to scavenge food and deliver it via airmail.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      There’s also a lot less energy spent upfront. A mammal (except that one) carries their child for a period inside of them while they grow. A bird lays an egg, which they have to care for but they aren’t as stuck with it and vulnerable, and usually for a shorter period. Essentially, a mammal’s child represents a much larger investment, so it makes sense to put more effort into ensuring it succeeds.