• BlueÆther@no.lastname.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    From something like this?

    If Earth were the size of a sand grain, this distance would be about the width of a hair in contrast to the corresponding 6-mile (10-km) distance to Alpha Centauri in the same scale.

    • ulkesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I suspect there’s a quite-overlapping Venn diagram of people who rely on LLMs for their “facts” with people who believe the earth is flat and people who believe ancient aliens are real.

  • LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    41.5 petameters.

    Nobody using the metric system says “trillion kilometers”! 🌞

    • Blaine@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      He literally told it to give the answer “in km”. That’s on him, not Bing.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      41.5 petameters.

      https://coco1453.wordpress.com/thinking-in-metric-for-astronomy/

      Nobody using the metric system says “trillion kilometers”!

      Unfortunately way too many people do even though it is not the correct SI unit for the scale, simply because ‘kilometer’ is the metric distance unit used for Earth distances. I have astronomy distances memorized as metric SI distances and I only care about the km distance so I can convert that to the SI distance. e.g. When I see “trillion kilometers” I convert that in my head to “quadrillion meters” which I then convert to “petameters”.

      I would rather see the base unit ‘meters’ than km so I can skip a step. My own preference for astronomy distance units is:

      metric SI units > meters > kilometers > non metric units

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      We should leave AI to the realm of producing fringe/impossible porn, like it was meant for and like what everyone actually wants from it. All this “search engine” stuff is just cover like when you buy some non-lube products like groceries along with the tube of astroglide at 1:00 AM.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      If you read the whole thing, it’s not wrong. It just highlighted a part that is wrong when taken out of context

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        What you’re referring to as “highlighting” here is what most of us consider the thing “answering the question”.

        “Where are you from?”

        “Connecticut. I was born and raised in Utah …”

        That first sentence is the answer to the question.

  • Gsus4@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Like every tool, it has its uses…but they are not those people want. LLMs are great for things where mistakes don’t detract from the result (or even add to it) like brainstorming, art, music, disinformation…all that good stuff.

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s what I think too. AI is mainly useful for things that don’t have right or wrong answers.

      Although this incorrect answers is obvious, what about all the times where an incorrect answer from AI is not obvious?

      • contrefeu@akko.contref.eu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        @Gsus4 @btaf45 That’s true for AI that has been trained for the general public to provide an answer for any provided question meaning they are forced to respond to a prompt even though they are wrong and maybe even know they are wrong. They just don’t know the answer and can’t say that because it’s commercially bad.

        I do believe that for scientific research AI models are much more precise because they have been trained with the right datasets and are tasked with answering specific questions.

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yeah that’s why it would be very nice if they would stop integrating it into fucking search engines.

      • Gsus4@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        They wanna fucking integrate it in everything, dumbfucks. This is why meritocracy is dead, the people with the means to determine where we go as a society are “number go up” people.

    • jj4211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      brainstorming

      Sure thing, but have to remember to include “no bad ideas” in the prompt for best results.

    • rhsJack@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’ll be the non jokey one here and bring us all down with the hard math. 13.6 kilometers converted into American is pretty much, like, way more than a half tank of gas unless you have a Prius. But you do you. Can you get me a slushie on the way back? You know I’m good for it.

    • IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s 126 miles to Chicago 13.6 kilometers to Alpha Centauri, we’ve got a full tank of gas, half a pack off cigarettes, it’s dark, and we’re wearing sunglasses.

  • _bcron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    AI sure is gonna be weird if we preface any question involving dimensions with some dumb arbitrary scale as reference.

    Depending on trim and accessories, the 2025 Chevrolet Silverado weighs anywhere from 1454 to 1533 watermelons

    • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      I use to be able to ask google the distance in kilometers of anything in space and get an accurate answer. So I first asked this same question in google but it only gave the answer in light years for some reason. That’s when I went to bing and got their ridiculous answer.

        • btaf45@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          According to the website Space, the distance is 37.8 trillion km.

          This is not correct, and is probably the result of rounding the light year distance to 4 ly before converting to km. The google answer is pretty close.

          The correct answer is the distance to Alpha Centauri is 41.5 petameters (trillion km) and the distance to Proxima Centauri is 40.2 petameters.

  • Intheflsun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Good golly, someone make some chocolate chip cookies, we’re going to have to go and welcome them to the neighborhood. Damn rude no one said anything sooner.