Friend who is not a software person sent me this tweet, which amused me as it did them. They asked if “runk” was real, which I assume not.

But what are some good examples of real ones like this? xz became famous for the hack of course, so i then read a bit about how important this compression algorithm is/was.

    • ᕙ(⇀‸↼‶)ᕗ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      sure? i tried 8bit transparent grayscale png generation and it turns out imagemagick produces images the kindle can display and ffmpeg fucks them up majorly and they wont show on kindle. ffmpeg is nice though.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        FFmpeg is basically the only piece of audio/video conversion software in widespread use. Everything uses it under the hood. Microsoft Teams used it to stream your webcam. VLC uses it to play video. If you’ve ever uploaded your video to an online service to convert it to a different file format or codec, chances are the server that processed it did so using FFmpeg.

        I have also noticed that FFmpeg kind of sucks at generating stills for reasons I’m not sure about though.

    • mox@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Libcurl is at the foundation of almost all networking.

      That’s not remotely true, but it is nevertheless outstanding work and very much deserving of recognition and support.

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And they still get emails from randos when some program that uses curl doesn’t work (the Readme is top notch).

          • Baku@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            I feel a bit split about this. Seems it is an actual law, and it kind of makes sense. You probably don’t want random components from unknown people and places in your multi million dollar space equipment. But it feels rather arrogant to just demand such things.

            Is NASA actually a customer? Did they pay for a license to use curl (genuine question - I’m not familiar enough with it to know if enterprises and organisations require a paid license)? Are they planning on becoming a paying customer? Do they make donations to the project? If not, it feels kind of rude to send a demand letter to the lead developer of a free piece of software straight up demanding a formal letter stating where the free software is being developed and maintained (for free), or if outside the USA, that the free software has been tested in the USA. Oh, and a bonus demand that such information be returned within 5 business days (naturally with an implied “or else”, just to really make sure those pesky people maintaining open source software for free really get the memo)

            In any case, why don’t all their scary 3 letter spy agencies go and figure it out on behalf of NASA themselves? It’s open source, they could just like, read the source, test the source, and audit the source themselves. Or fork it and make any modifications they’d like to ensure its safety

            I don’t blame the person sending the emails, obviously, they’re just following orders, but the whole email reads as very entitled and arrogant, assuming NASA don’t provide any compensation to the project and projects maintainers for their use of curl

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      curl is most definitely not developed solely by one person though, it has thousands of contributors. in fact, there is so much red tape around curl that you can’t even discuss making a change to it without first writing an RFC and having it approved by a committee.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I think Linus sits at the intersection of both groups. Linus is not some Ronald. The Ronalds of this world are for example the creator of core-js.

    • sus@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Actually I think he has already had an adequate amount of recognition:

      • “In 1999, Red Hat and VA Linux, both leading developers of Linux-based software, presented Torvalds with stock options in gratitude for his creation.[29] That year both companies went public and Torvalds’s share value briefly shot up to about US$20 million”

      • his autobiography is in several hundred library collections worldwide

      Awards he’s received:

      • 2 honorary doctorates

      • 2 celestial objects named after him

      • Lovelace Medal

      • IEEE Computer Pioneer Award

      • EFF Pioneer Award

      • Vollum Award

      • Hall of Fellows of the Computer History Museum

      • C&C prize

      • Millenium Technology Prize

      • Internet Hall of Fame

      • IEEE Masaru Ibuka Consumer Electronics Award

      • Great Immigrants Award

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Wow! A company gave away money without being contractually obligated to do so? The world sure has changed since then. I’m glad that Torvalds is doing well, he completely changed the world.

        I wonder how Brahm Cohen is doing. He also had a huge impact on the world. I know he got a write-up in Wired Magazine after inventing Bit Torrent (that’s how I learned about it way back then), but I haven’t heard much about him since.

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Oh and then you get all the projects with recursive acronyms, like WINE Is Not Emulation, MAME Ain’t (an) Mp3 Encoder, and of course GNU’s Not Unix.

  • deathmetal27@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Imagemagick.

    Every website that supports avatar images and has multiple sizes of the avatars uses imagemagick.

    Another one is OpenSSL.

    • rothaine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s also worth pointing out that this was sued in a copyright lawsuit some time ago. The wikipedia article mentions it, but here’s the slashdot discussion if you want to feel like stepping into a time machine: https://m.slashdot.org/story/158778

      It caused a momentary panic when everyone realized that this thing runs the system clocks for everything everywhere, and if it got taken down by a copyright suit it would be disastrous for, well, everybody.

    • Piece_Maker@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Wasn’t there also very recently a whole thing about the single guy who maintains the NTP spec threatened to retire so he could get a “real” job, which caused a gigantic internet-wide panic as pretty much everything we do relies on computer’s clocks being perfectly synced?

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Perhaps we’ll move to UTC+10¼, and then move forward 45 minutes in the summer.

        If the day number is a prime, then we’ll go back π hours.

        Hope that will help!

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It would make sooo much more sense for the ISO to set something up, and make governments each responsible for keeping it updated, since they’re the ones doing the changing.

        Require all participants to amend their law/regulations, so there’s a note to prompt whoever is in power and changes it next.

        I’m sure some places would still neglect to do it… Haha

  • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I mean, it was either Richard Stallman or Dennis Ritchie that created grep in an evening so that a buddy of his could do research on volumes of text that wouldn’t fit in the RAM of a PDP-11 (or similar machine. I’m telling this story from memory). It’s designed to do what you would do with the ancient text editor ed using the commands Global, Regular Expression, and Print. g re p. grep. Probably the most important piece of software ever written in a couple hours.

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    core-js (whose maintainer is also a bit picky about and probably doesn’t understand the OSS process) Phil Katz, the guy who invented .zip. To this day, every .zip file contains his initials in hexadecmial. His story is incredibly interesting.

    • Electric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Oh dear, that post from the core-js guy made my blood boil. He’s been taken advantage of by the whole world.

    • Pyro@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      The core-js story always makes me sad. Sure, he’s developing an open source project and no one HAS to pay him. But the meager amount of donations and the tons of hate he receives isn’t justifiable either.

      • Thomrade@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I had seen the hate before and foolishly just assumed he was deserving of it. Its a horrible situation he’s in and he is being cast in a bad light because he reached out for help.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        It’s especially sadder when a substantial amount of the donations vanished when Open Collective and others stopped operating to Russians.

    • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah that debacle still pisses me off. Especially the fact that someone could possibly trademark and enforce a trademark a name that’s already in use. It’s made even worse that the package that now uses the stolen name is defunct.

      I hope all of the bad actors burn in Hell.

        • dohpaz42@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What did NPM remove? My understanding is that NPM restored the deleted package. If you’re referring to giving the author the ability to delete their packages, I’m on the fence about that. On the one hand, if it’s open source, it’s a part of the community. On the other hand, it’s also still the author’s code, and if they are the only author, then it’s their sole decision if they want to host their code under their account.

    • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Azer did nothing wrong.

      Laurie Voss made a bad call and should feel bad.

      The principals of free software was, is, and always will be more important than every single dollar in silicon valley combined.

      • TheSlad@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        I think he overreacted a bit, not to having his package name forcibly taken from him, but to being asked to give it up in the first place. Kik explained to him that they have to fight this or lose their tradmark because thats how trademark law works. His response was basically “haha fuck you”. He probably could’ve asked for a couple thousand and just changed the name of his project and everything would’ve been fine.

        • magic_smoke@links.hackliberty.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          being asked to give it up in the first place. Kik explained to him that they have to fight this or lose their tradmark because thats how trademark law works.

          I’m not a lawyer but from what I know that’s a load of shit. There’s nothing stopping a trademark holder from granting licensing rights to third parties, without charge, to use their trademark in specific ways.

          They chose not to because its easier, and most people won’t know better, so they roll over.

          His response was basically “haha fuck you”. He probably could’ve asked for a couple thousand and just changed the name of his project and everything would’ve been fine.

          This is the correct response, even if Kik would’ve given him money. It’s his package, he got the name first. Corpos can eat shit, just because its not the easy choice, or the choice you would’ve made doesn’t mean it was wrong. That package should’ve stayed down on principal.

      • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        No arguments there, if you’re gonna depend on a piece of code, you better own it or have a rock solid plan b.

  • Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    NTP is the one that comes to mind for me.

    Basically every device uses it and until fairly recently was maintained by a single person