• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      More economically to shut down and reincorporate than to spend a bunch of money on lawyers.

      But I doubt Musk is going to see a flood of new ad revenue out of this.

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        new ad revenue

        I’m no marketing guy, and all other things aside, signing an advertising agreement with X would be a hard “NO” after this suit.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Maybe it’s a Win win. Less advertisers and Elon looks like a psychopath and disuades further ad income for his hate platform

  • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Today, the House Judiciary GOP’s official account on X called GARM being discontinued a “big win for the First Amendment” and a “big win for oversight.” X CEO Linda Yaccarino also applauded the news.

    It’s just opposite day? We just say whatever it the opposite of what’s true?

  • schema@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Even if this group shuts down completely, all this does is waste twitter’s money while it also tells advertisers to stay the fuck away from ever do any business on Twitter.

    • SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      And now he has to sue the advertisers individually if he wants to continue this idiotic plan. That’ll surely convince people to spend money on X

    • Vanon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I read this similarly. Most significantly, advertisers in the group are probably less likely to spend on tweeter now. The complete opposite of Elen’s goal. The advertisers simply “deleted” the group (not any actual ad agencies), because it was calculated to cost the least. The group, GARM, was an attempt to collectively manage harm to their brands, which they will obviously continue to do in other ways.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Musk: starts allowing Nazi shit on Xitter

    Advertiisers: Hey, we don’t like Nazi shit. We might stop advertising if that keeps happening.

    Musk: Go fuck yourself. Is that clear? I hope it is.

    Advertisers: stop doing business with the guy who told them to go fuck themselves

  • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Good. They don’t get to fucking bully whoever they want.

    Elon didn’t like their shit, and called them on it.

    And they fucking cried and gave up, right away. lmao

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      you hate people bullying people yet you love elon bullying a non profit into silence?

      also this isn’t going to bring advertisers to twitter.

    • FiskFisk33@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      how do you mean? they just “hydra’d” on him. If he wants to sue them now for leaving xitter he will have to go after them individually.

      • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yep, the irony of two bullies calling each other bullies is awesome to watch!

        But Elon won, cuz the other side shut down quick! lmao

        • androogee (they/she)@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          What did he win? They aren’t going to resume advertising with him. They got out of the lawsuit without having to pay lawyers or change their behavior. What did he win?

          • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            So do you honestly think he just wanted their money?

            You don’t think that Elon Musk is over there laughing because they dropped the lawsuit, and thinking that he’s top dog cuz they went away?

            Have you seen his ego?

            I mean, I like Elon, but he’s def a slave to his ego. I still like him, but come on…lol

            He started a legal fight with someone, they backed down. Money losses or not, he definitely won. Because they dropped.

            And he is grinning.

            I mean, I def would prefer money. But I don’t think that’s always his goal.

              • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                And he has more money than you or I or anyone we will ever know.

                So yeah, dude, he’s winning at something. Even if you don’t like him.

                He’s richer than most of us can dream.

              • Socialist Berserker@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                Because he has the balls to do what he wants. Even when all you guys scream and cry.

                Regardless of whether you like him or hate him, he works hard, gets shit done. Even if you don’t like it.

                Now having said that, I also don’t give a shit if he loses it all. I admire him, but I don’t worship him.

                And I fucking LOVE what he did with Twitter. Liberals cry censorship now that it doesn’t always favor them on the platform, but they laughed when republicans cried censorship on the old twitter.

                By the way, censorship sucks regardless of platform. I just find it laughingly ironic how you all cry now, but where laughing then.

                In other words, you think it’s fine to censor republican stuff. But get fucking mad when democrat stuff gets censored.

                You all were doing the same fucking thing!

                • ZeroHora@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Regardless of whether you like him or hate him, he works hard, gets shit done. Even if you don’t like it.

                  The guy is terminally online talking shit on xitter all day how the fuck he works hard?

    • lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t get it. Elon didn’t win a thing, he lost harder.

      He complained advertisers were banding together and boycotting his platform. He starts a frivolous lawsuit.

      So now even more advertisers are boycotting his platform.

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    I feel like this will only hurt him in the long term, advertisers in general are probably more likely to avoid X in the future. I know I would.

  • themurphy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    He literally bullied a non-profit organisation set in the world to use advertisement money responsible into ceasing operations.

    Loss for the world once again, and the article even says that Republicans celebrated. That country is sick.

  • DrunkenPirate@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    Note to myself: Whenever I do contracts or somehow being responsible, I‘ll put a proxy company in between. If things go bad, I just shut down that responsible proxy and am out of duty.

    Just an interesting observation about business behavior.

    • Thebular@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It definitely is, but they filed in Texas which doesn’t have anti-SLAPP laws for federal cases

  • Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    They are getting all this great free press about why to avoid Musk, must have figured their job is done.

  • AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    On the one hand I hate Elon Musk. On the other hand I also hate advertisement.

    So… win / win?

    • YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Idk, advertisers didn’t get shut down, a group promoting best practices in advertising got shut down.

      You’re about to dislike ads even more.

    • gearheart@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Lose/lose situation here unfortunately.

      Basically he threw a fit. It worked.

      It affected something that it should not have.

    • ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They are all the biggest snowflakes. The slightest criticism breaks their fragile egos. Billionaires really require a safe space.

    • Gsus4@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s cheap to them and bankrupts their victims or forces them to settle. There should be a way to punish frivolous lawsuits by %income/assets.