Gin Rummy : I always say the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : Simply because you don’t have evidence that something does exist does not mean you have evidence of something that doesn’t exist.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : What country are you from?
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : ‘What’ ain’t no country I ever heard of! They speak English in ‘What’?
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : English, motherfucker! Do you speak it?
Riley : Yeah.
Gin Rummy : So you understand the words I’m saying to you!
Riley : Yeah.
Gin Rummy : Well, what I’m saying is that there are known knowns and that there are known unknowns. But there are also unknown unknowns; things we don’t know that we don’t know.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : Say what again! Say what again! I dare you! I double dare you, motherfucker! Say what one more time!
I mean tbf you can’t prove he didn’t do it. So AP was right to remove it
Raises hand to object by noting the Ad Ignorantiam fallacy… You know what, like JD I’ll let it slide…
Gin Rummy : I always say the absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : Simply because you don’t have evidence that something does exist does not mean you have evidence of something that doesn’t exist.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : What country are you from?
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : ‘What’ ain’t no country I ever heard of! They speak English in ‘What’?
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : English, motherfucker! Do you speak it?
Riley : Yeah.
Gin Rummy : So you understand the words I’m saying to you!
Riley : Yeah.
Gin Rummy : Well, what I’m saying is that there are known knowns and that there are known unknowns. But there are also unknown unknowns; things we don’t know that we don’t know.
Riley : What?
Gin Rummy : Say what again! Say what again! I dare you! I double dare you, motherfucker! Say what one more time!
100%