• missancap@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    11 months ago

    It’s true. Everything I don’t like is socialist. And referring to things that don’t work as socialist no matter the context is an excellent idea, I’ll be doing that from now on.

      • missancap@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        Because I’m considering the audience. If a socialist is calling me a dickhead, then I’m probably right.

        • masquenox@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          11 months ago

          If a socialist calls you a dickhead, it means they’re still trying to spare your feels.

        • Hadriscus@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          I feel like this is a teaching opportunity. I’m no teacher, and certainly no academic, but socialism is a political stance that socializes basic needs, such as healthcare, transportation or education (primary and secondary). “Socialization” means every single citizen pays for those through the tax system, every year or so, proportionally to their own income. This allows everyone, regardless of their status, to enjoy good health, regular trains and buses, and a complete education, all without paying extra. It also prevents these basic amenities from falling into the wrong hands, ie those of capitalists who would gladly hike up prices, taking avantage of the fact that they’re vital things. It is something to strive for. I hope I helped make this notion clearer. Cheers

          • salsamolle [any]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            yes. Also providing for the basic needs of the people lowers the cost of life, since a government in control of its country’s banks doesn’t usually have money problems (owes all the debt in its own currency to itself), and therefore doesn’t need to profit from services. This gives people more extra income to spend or invest on whatever, which helps economic growth. Ironically western governments are doing the exact opposite, which leads me to think we’ll just wither away from the world stage. I guess its good news in some way, not in first hand experience though ;-;

    • MalarchoBidenism [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      11 months ago

      Ancaps when the
      when the corporate conglomerate that owns their house demands they pay the property tax fee or else they go to private jail (it’s not a state)

      ancap-good

    • salsamolle [any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      “Socialism is when the government does stuff. The more stuff it does, the more socialist it is. And if it does a real lot of stuff, it’s communism

      Please do correct me

      • Fazoo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Breathe air in your privately owned company? Straight to ban.