There’s really no credible argument that their distribution of books even might be legal.
Their only defense is fair use, and there’s no precedent for a “fair use” defense justifying copying a work wholesale for mass distribution. (Yes, “one copy at a time” to multiple people is mass distribution. Copying a whole work has effectively only qualified as fair use when that copy is not re-distributed, and is actually for a personal backup.)
There’s really no credible argument that their distribution of books even might be legal.
Their only defense is fair use, and there’s no precedent for a “fair use” defense justifying copying a work wholesale for mass distribution. (Yes, “one copy at a time” to multiple people is mass distribution. Copying a whole work has effectively only qualified as fair use when that copy is not re-distributed, and is actually for a personal backup.)