☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 18 days agoAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkAmerica’s assassination attempt on Huawei is backfiringwww.economist.com☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.mlEnglish · 18 days agomessage-square17fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoWait so ARM isn’t open? Ok now it makes sense
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoNo it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-218 days agoI still don’t understand. Is it like RHEL (they give you all the source code) or more like Windows?
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoIt’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip. So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·edit-218 days agoToo technical; didn’t understand. I prefer RISC-V at this point
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoHow can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
minus-squareGolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoYou didn’t say it’s fully open-source so RISC-V is better no matter how “open” ARM is
minus-squareerwan@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoYes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
minus-squareMoonrise2473@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·18 days agoClosed source but if you pay enough you can get the source
Wait so ARM isn’t open? Ok now it makes sense
No it’s not, anyone can get a license to create an ARM chipset but you do need to pay for a license.
I still don’t understand. Is it like RHEL (they give you all the source code) or more like Windows?
It’s neither. It’s a specification that you can use to build your own chip.
So it’s more like MPEG where you can read the doc and create your own implementation.
Too technical; didn’t understand. I prefer RISC-V at this point
How can you have a preference if you don’t understand?
You didn’t say it’s fully open-source so RISC-V is better no matter how “open” ARM is
Yes, on the licensing front RISC-V is better.
Closed source but if you pay enough you can get the source