vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agoSupreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawfulwww.cnbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square146fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rules gun 'bump stocks’ ban is unlawfulwww.cnbc.comvegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 month agomessage-square146fedilink
minus-squarederf82@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoMy point is, they did not rule a ban unconstitutional, since they asked where it was in the constitution.
minus-squarecatloaf@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI read it as asking where in the Constitution there is a right to bump stocks. Did you read as asking where the ban is?
minus-squarederf82@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoAnd there is no constitutional right to bump stocks. They just ruled there is no current law against it. If there was a constitutional right to them, you couldn’t ban them even with a law. I didn’t say he was asking where the ban is.
My point is, they did not rule a ban unconstitutional, since they asked where it was in the constitution.
I read it as asking where in the Constitution there is a right to bump stocks. Did you read as asking where the ban is?
And there is no constitutional right to bump stocks. They just ruled there is no current law against it. If there was a constitutional right to them, you couldn’t ban them even with a law.
I didn’t say he was asking where the ban is.