• Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I mean at that point you struggle to escape, but assuming that’s definitely not possible, then sharp sticks hurt less. 🤷‍♂️ “Optimal” does not necessarily mean “good” or “desirable”.

      • Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, equally deep and long injuries with a sharper implement destroy fewer cells (since they have a smaller cross-section), cause less trauma, and are less disruptive to the surrounding tissues. I know it’s unintuitive, but it’s true.

      • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The dull stick is going to gouge your eye out entirely. I have no frame of reference of what would hurt more, but I guess that would be it.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          No a dull stick would probably fuck your eye up, a sharp stick will absolutely destroy your eye.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Yes if fired the dull stick out of a fucking cannon it would destroy the eye, how many bits of criteria are we going to add to this (what should be anyway) very straightforward analogy?

              • VOwOxel@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                There are times when a clean cut hurts less than a crude one. We’re not talking about actual damage done, which wasn’t part of the analogy to begin with.