simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoSid Meier’s Civilization VII - Official Teaser Trailerwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
arrow-up11arrow-down1external-linkSid Meier’s Civilization VII - Official Teaser Trailerwww.youtube.comsimple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: games@sh.itjust.works
minus-square🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoBetween 4, 5 and 6, I don’t even know if I want another Civ game. I usually just play 4, despite having 1-6. 4 is like the peak of the series.
minus-squaresilasmariner@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoCiv II expansion was peak. I never felt better than the one time I managed to win as humans in the humanity Vs aliens scenario
minus-squarePingudiem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThat was test of Time wasn’t it. So many fond memories
minus-squaredjsaskdja@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.
minus-squareChailles@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoArmies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.
minus-squaremox@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI thought 5 was quite good with the Brave New World expansion/rework.
minus-square🇸🇵🇪🇨🇺🇱🇦🇹🇪🇷@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoI strongly prefer 5 to 6, 6 always felt like it was designed to be played on a tablet.
minus-squareA_Random_Idiot@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-21 month agoYep. 5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral. 4 is the best of what civlization has to offer. 4 was also great in that it got two expansions instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.
Between 4, 5 and 6, I don’t even know if I want another Civ game. I usually just play 4, despite having 1-6. 4 is like the peak of the series.
Civ II expansion was peak. I never felt better than the one time I managed to win as humans in the humanity Vs aliens scenario
That was test of Time wasn’t it. So many fond memories
I’m glad they moved away from unit death stacks in 5 and 6. I think 5 has the best art direction, but 6 is peak gameplay for me.
Armies in 5 and 6 are kind of underwhelming. Maybe a compromise of having terrain have unit capacities, with various units taking up more space.
I thought 5 was quite good with the Brave New World expansion/rework.
I strongly prefer 5 to 6, 6 always felt like it was designed to be played on a tablet.
Yep.
5 was okay and different, but was definitely the start of the downward spiral.
4 is the best of what civlization has to offer.
4 was also great in that it got two expansions
instead of 150 million tiny DLC for insane prices.