Bob@midwest.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoEveryday, as an Americanmidwest.socialimagemessage-square298fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageEveryday, as an Americanmidwest.socialBob@midwest.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square298fedilink
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoSome ISO8601 formats are good, but some are unreadable (like 20240607T054831Z for date and time).
minus-squarezqwzzle@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 month agoThe ones without separators tend to be for server/client exchange though.
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI agree but they’re hard to read at a glance when debugging and there’s lots of them :) Having said that, a lot of client-server communications use Unix timestamps though, which are even harder to read at a glance.
minus-squareShardikprime@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up0·1 month agoI mean I like this one without the separations
ISO8601 gang
Represeeeeent!
Some ISO8601 formats are good, but some are unreadable (like 20240607T054831Z for date and time).
The ones without separators tend to be for server/client exchange though.
I agree but they’re hard to read at a glance when debugging and there’s lots of them :)
Having said that, a lot of client-server communications use Unix timestamps though, which are even harder to read at a glance.
I mean I like this one without the separations