A ephebophile is a older adult who are sexually attracted to 15 and 19.

It really grinds my gears that society doesn’t have a problem with a 18 year old having consensual sex with a 17-year-old. Even though the 18 year old is an adult and the 17 year old is a minor. But if 26 year old has consensual sex with a 18 year old. Ah then society has a problem. But why should that be a problem? When both actions are completely harmless as long as both people are consenting adults.

  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    In the OP I clearly say that ephebophilia between two consenting adults is not morally wrong.

    this argument is flawed because

    #ephebophelia cannot exist between two adults since

    So do you think a 26 year old man being sexually attracted to a 18 or 19 your woman is not a ephebophile?

    first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

    Straw man

    A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.

    • TrenGoblin@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Love how you just dodge my question So I will ask you again do you think a 26 year old man who is only sexually attracted to 18 and 19 year old woman is. not a ephebophile By definition?

      • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        for, like, the fifth time…

        first, i don’t believe you’re interested in that, or you wouldn’t be here trying to convince everyone it’s ok to fuck kids. but, also:

        Straw man

        A straw man fallacy (sometimes written as strawman) is the informal fallacy of refuting an argument different from the one actually under discussion, while not recognizing or acknowledging the distinction.[1] One who engages in this fallacy is said to be “attacking a straw man”.