• testfactor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      I mean, I recall seeing a ton of press a while back that the percentage of the Texas power grid that was renewable keeps growing because it’s more economically viable than traditional power plants.

      So, like, he may not be wrong. Solar and wind just keep getting cheaper. It’s not like businesses will spend extra money to burn coal, just to spite the environment.

        • testfactor@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          I mean, I think that’s what the majority of people are advocating for in green circles too, no? “No New Coal” and all that?

          I don’t hear much advocacy for tearing down working power plants.

          Power plants don’t exactly have an infinite shelf life. They get run down and need to be replaced. Eventually only building green leads to only having green.

          Combine that with the ever increasing cost of actually running a coal fire plant. Shipping in hundreds of tons of coal is eventually gonna get way more expensive than operating a solar or wind farm. At that point the business owners will likely tear the plant down of their own volition to replace it with the cheaper option. (Though that will be admittedly a little slower, as you have to amortize in the construction and downtime costs.)

    • DMBFFF@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      😁

      Your cynicism is both understandable and warranted.

      That said, a few Libertarians speak of pollution being a violation of the NAP.

    • Neato@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      “Trust corporations to save us without any incentive to do so.”

      Fuck that, fuck Chase, fuck corporations.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      if businesses are left to their own devices, they will “develop the technologies that will power us into the future, not using carbon-based fuels,”

      glances at Communist Chinese EVs

      So… Um…

    • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      he did not offer any concrete examples of how that would work.

      Libertarian “thinking” in a nutshell, really

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        And yet, there are so many counter examples to pull from. Like, the basis of most regulations start with companies, who had been left to their own devices, completely screwing their customers, workers, and the environment.

        But sure. It would work this time if we take off the guardrails.

        Yep.

        • hydroptic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Clearly the problem is too much regulation! If we stop regulating companies completely, they’ll ✨magically✨ just start doing the right thing.

          Shhhh don’t talk about historical precedent for that not working, libertarian brains can’t handle that sort of stuff. Just repeat after me: TAXATION IS THEFT, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, WAR IS PEACE