• theneverfox@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    No, that’s my point exactly… Public health communication is deliberately oversimplified and stripped of all nuance like this. It’s a deliberate technique taught in school

    • someguy3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      Ok I have no idea what overall point you’re trying to make in this conversation as a whole, so I think this will be my last reply.

      If it is so simplified that it misses the point entirely and to the point that it gives the wrong impression of what’s going on (to the point that I question if the person even understands it themselves) then it’s infuriating to listen to them talk. Which people eat up, and then regurgitate, which is the wrong impression of what’s going on. It’s very easy to give some misleading narrative which people eat up. Most of this is not so complicated that it can’t be explained.

      • theneverfox@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        My point is just that the statement “children do better when their parents stay together” is responsible public health messaging. Elaborating on it is heavily discouraged outside a technical setting, because a lot of people will leave that room with the exact opposite take away if you start talking about counterexamples

        What you’re describing is following best practices (although he might also have a punchable face, he doesn’t sound very charismatic)