starman@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agoActually, Winamp is not going Open Sourceprogramming.devimagemessage-square93fedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up11arrow-down1imageActually, Winamp is not going Open Sourceprogramming.devstarman@programming.dev to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 months agomessage-square93fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaresorghum@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoI look at ‘source available’ software as the right to review the code yourself to ensure there’s no malicious behavior, not for community development.
minus-squaresolrize@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·2 months agoYou mean if you build it yourself? I guess that is something, but it is still conceivable to sneak stuff in. Look at that xzlib backdoor from a few weeks ago.
I look at ‘source available’ software as the right to review the code yourself to ensure there’s no malicious behavior, not for community development.
You mean if you build it yourself? I guess that is something, but it is still conceivable to sneak stuff in. Look at that xzlib backdoor from a few weeks ago.