• kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      No normal consumer user would have any reasonable use case for this kind of bandwidth.

      This is data center and backbone network stuff.

      • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        ultimately the end consumer is going to run their connection through it SOMEWHERE, or something very similar more than likely.

        It’s not going to be FTTH levels of connectivity, but interconnect to ISP it very well could be.

    • phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Also 1.2 million times less likely to leave the research stadium because even if this is true (very big if already) it’s still “new and exciting and revolutionary improvement #3626462” this week alone. Revolutionary new battery tech comes out twice a week if you believe the pop sci tech sites, it’s 99.9% crap

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Battery advancements aren’t crap. We’ve gotten 5-8% improvement in capacity per year, which compounds to a doubling every 10 to 15 years. Every advancement covered by over sensationalized pop sci articles you’ve ever heard has contributed to that. It’s important not to let sensationalism make you jaded to actual advancements.

        Now, as for broadband, we haven’t pushed out the technologies to the last mile that we already have. However, this sort of thing is useful for the backbone and universities. Universities sometimes have to transfer massive amounts of data, and some of the most efficient ways to do that are a van full of hard drives.