It is because communism (in the sense being tankie) is far less radical than what we actually need. It is just imperialism with some red aesthetics. This is not the way, this is surrender.
If “in the sense being tankie” is not clear enough for you, I do not mean possible communism ideal, but I mean actually existing “communism”, like in USSR, which, besides some social advantages, was a red authoritarism.
It is because communism (in the sense being tankie) is far less radical than what we actually need. It is just imperialism with some red aesthetics. This is not the way, this is surrender.
Communism is inherently anti imperialistic. Maybe read a book before you spread red scare propaganda.
Do you mean the communism’s ideal or actually existing “communism” of “anti-imperialist” USSR? I read about both and live in a post-soviet country.
If everything is shared under communism, that would include political power. So that would make communism a direct democracy.
Does that sound like the nation’s you have in mind?
If “in the sense being tankie” is not clear enough for you, I do not mean possible communism ideal, but I mean actually existing “communism”, like in USSR, which, besides some social advantages, was a red authoritarism.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tankie
F tankies. Be gay, do eco-trolling crime. Stay based fren.