tulipas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.comexternal-linkmessage-square15fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkThe highest funded plagiarist is probably this AI ethicistandreasplagiarism.wordpress.comtulipas@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square15fedilink
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agoplagiarism is an academic crime. failing to cite a source is completely amoral.
minus-squarejust_another_person@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·edit-27 months agoNo, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive. I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months agothat doesnt mean its immoral. and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
minus-squareHACKthePRISONS@kolektiva.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up0·7 months ago>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality this makes no sense.
plagiarism is an academic crime.
failing to cite a source is completely amoral.
No, it’s also possible to be sued for plagiarism, so defacto punitive.
I would also err on the side of ethics versus morality for something that doesn’t directly and intentionally do harm on its outset.
that doesnt mean its immoral.
and as far as i can tell, its not even true. you can be sued for copyright infringement but plagiarism is not codified.
>would also err on the side of ethics versus morality
this makes no sense.