It is fun to think about the Simulation Theory but most discussions revolve around it being likely that we are in one.

What are some concrete reasons why it’s all science fiction and not reality?

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 months ago

    Or the code that represents pi (or similar) has a recursion bug. The real value for pi is supposed to be succinct, but that damn angle tracing algorithm gets stuck in a computation loop. That ticket has been open for 3.2 billion years, but we’re getting to it.

    • postmateDumbass@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Alternitively, the simulation can handle pi perfectly, but does not expose to us a perfect way to quantify it. We are limited to one Planck length resolution.

      • Ultraviolet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        This is such a frustratingly common misconception about the Planck length. It’s not a pixel density, the Planck time is not a framerate. You can have lengths that are not multiples of the Planck length. The only significance to the Planck length is it’s the distance scale where gravity becomes as strong as the nuclear forces, and physics gets weird.

    • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Recursion would imply that’s its a regular repeating sequence, not an irregular one, no? Pi, and other irrational numbers, have no pattern. They do not repeat.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Recursion would imply that’s its a regular repeating sequence, not an irregular one, no?

        No. A loop is recursive if it calls itself, it can still do different work each time. As a less than ideal example, I can write a function that concats a character from /dev/random to a string then call itself. It will go forever without repeating itself.

      • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        Pi has a pattern, just not a repeating one. There are algorithms to calculate it to arbitrary precision.

        • iAmTheTot@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          A pattern is, by definition, repeating. Pi does not repeat. At least not that we’ve yet calculated, and we’ve gotten to thirteen trillion digits which is frankly incomprehensible.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s what you get for logging it as a Priority 2 case which has a next universe response time. You should have logged it as P1 which has a half universe response time and the sla hasn’t been breached yet.

    • PlexSheep@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 months ago

      Why would a CONSTANT be computer by a function? And also, who makes a function that is just a getter for a constant recursive by accident? And do they not have tests for that? How can an important constant like Pi have a bug in production?