Jon Stewart mocked both President Biden and former President Trump during his return to “The Daily Show,” saying both 2024 candidates are “stretching the limits of being able to handle the toughest job in the world.”

After a nine-year absence, the 61-year-old comedian returned to hosting duties on the Comedy Central show to raucous applause Monday. The cable network announced last month that Stewart would sit at the anchor desk on Monday nights, with a rotating lineup of other hosts on other weekdays.

Stewart took aim early in his monologue at Biden and his response to special counsel Robert Hur’s classified records report that drew attention to the president’s age and cognitive ability.

“This guy couldn’t remember stuff during his deposition. Do you understand what that means? He had no ability to recall very basic things under questioning,” Stewart said, before then zinging Trump and playing footage of him being unable to recall facts during depositions.

“Biden’s lost a step, but Trump regularly says things at rallies that would warrant a wellness check,” Stewart said to laughs.

“The question then becomes, what the f‑‑‑ are we doing here, people?” said a seemingly exasperated Stewart.

“We have two candidates who are chronologically outside the norm of anyone who has run for the presidency in this country, in the history of this country,” Stewart said of the 81-year-old Biden and 77-year-old Trump. “They are the oldest people ever to run for president — breaking by only four years the record that they set the last time they ran!” Stewart exclaimed.

“We’re not suggesting neither man is vibrant, productive or even capable,” Stewart said.

Striking a more sober tone, Stewart said: “What’s crazy is thinking that we are the ones as voters who must silence concerns and criticisms. It is the candidates’ job to assuage concerns — not the voters’ job not to mention them.”

While Biden “isn’t Donald Trump,” Stewart said, mentioning the 45th president’s multiple indictments and legal cases against him, “the stakes of this election don’t make Donald Trump’s opponent less subject to scrutiny.”

“It actually makes him more subject to scrutiny,” Stewart said.

Come Election Day, Stewart said, “If your guy loses, bad things might happen, but the country is not over. And if your guy wins, the country is in no way saved.”

“So the good news is: I’m not saying you don’t have to worry about who wins the election,” Stewart concluded.

“I’m saying you have to worry about every day before it, and every day after, forever.”

  • t3rmit3@beehaw.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    From my other comment:

    This belies the fact that there is a TON of work being done, constantly, by organizers at all levels. The problem is that you cannot out-raise party-aligned Super PACs with grassroots, individual funding. You can’t reach a wider audience with door-to-door campaigning, than a Super PAC can with TV and internet ads. You can’t meet the primary debate requirements set by the parties (when they don’t just not hold debates altogether), when the parties are intentionally making those requirements impossible for grassroots campaigns to meet.

    Our political system is set up to discourage political engagement. Organizing takes time, money, community, and civic-mindedness, and our society is set up to sap all of those away from the average person. You’re basically just blaming the people who are overcoming those barriers, to organize and be politically-engaged, for the fact it’s impossible for them to singlehandledly overcome the political apathy that the system is built to propagate.

    All of your concerns are fixed when everyone pays attention for more than one out of every four years. Until that happens…

    That will never happen, because as I said, our political system does not want that to happen, and works to make sure it doesn’t. So what you’re really saying is, “don’t ever push for change within the party itself, just toe the party line”.

    No thanks.

    • Pratai@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Nope… that’s not what I’m saying. That’s what you’re wanting me to have said.

      What I AM saying, is what I said:

      If people are only going to pay after or one year out of every four- and do nothing but whine to strangers that don’t care online…. Don’t expect to see the change you want.

      • t3rmit3@beehaw.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        You have no clue whether someone online who is complaining is in fact only engaging in politics “one year out of every four”, so this is just showcasing your own assumptions.