I don’t get it. Her music is sometimes catchy but otherwise unremarkable, from the songs I’ve heard. How does she break all these records and accumulate so much fame and wealth?

She’s pretty, but a lot of singer songwriters are, especially those with makeup and costume people, a support staff.

Is there something else to her that people like?

I’m confused about what makes her so apparently uniquel or phenomenal.

  • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    Think of a dish made by a world class chef, that food is probably exquisitely crafted using unique and fresh ingredients. There probably aren’t that many people out there who truly appreciate it, and probably a lot who just think it’s weird.

    Now think of pizza. It’s relatively cheap and broadly appealing. It wouldn’t be put in the same class as the food prepared by the chef, but a lot more of it gets consumed.

    Taylor Swift is talented, pretty, affable, has a superior work ethic, and makes music that’s catchy and easily digestible. Like pizza, her music appeals to the broadest group of people.

    • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I like this explanation, but I feel like there are plenty of other artists who fit into that category.

      Is it just random that they had to pick one brand of pizza to go crazy over do you think?

      • bilboswaggings@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Gordon Ramsay isn’t the best chef on the world, still he has the most restaurants by a big margin

        A ton of people would say Tswift is their ultimate fantasy fuck even though she isn’t the hottest girl on the planet (she still could be a model probably, being slim and tall)

        Being famous always has a certain pull to it and if you do it right you can leverage being famous to become even more famous

        Worlds top athletes are overpaid (at least in team sports) would you rather have the #1 player or a team full of top 100 players… Well the #1 player sells a ton of merch, but almost always the team with more depth is winning games (if the budget is equal)

        • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Top athletes are grossly underpaid. Basketball straight up truncates them. Giannis would make at least double on the open market. Football, the best players make the same as second and third tier players at their position, entirely dependent on when they hit FA.

      • Runwaylights@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Luck and timing are big factors. There are many talented artists out there that work hard and make the kind of music that (in theory) should appeal to a large audience but never make it. Either at all or not to the level of Taylor Swift. If you make the right music at the right time, your chances increase but you still need luck.

        Edit: what I’ve heard of Taylor is that she’s very good in making the right music at the right time. The songs fit the trends in music. But I’ve never listened much to her, so I don’t know for sure if its correct

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Thanks, someone else compared her to other pop stars like Michael Jackson and Madonna, and all of those people were at the forefront of their particular movement.

          I feel like Taylor Swift is just in the middle of all the other pop stars.

          Appreciate it, I’m going to try and look into it from that perspective, maybe I just don’t understand the music world at all. I definitely don’t.

          • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I just remembered a big factor as to why artists such as Madonna have a long career: they managed to appeal to the queer crowd, who tend to be fiercely dedicated to anyone who stands up for them.

        • edric@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Don’t forget the money and connections. IIRC her father literally created a bought(?) or created(?) a label to sign her. There a lot more talented artists out there but she had the money and connections that gave her a very big headstart.

      • soloner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        My brother is a swiftie and seems to think that her talent is above and beyond a standard artists talent. One thing that is praised is how much range she has covered across her albums.

        I’m personally not a fan, and to me she seems overrated, but I also have to recognize the mass following and legitimate consistency in the music quality. She’s not like a Katy Perry recycling the same tune.

        So I think she’s like a really nice pizza, appealing but always good quality, always fresh.

        • TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          She might not recycle the same tune, but it kinda seems like she recycles the same themes verbatim. I’d say she’s closer to Papa John’s than a good quality pizza shop. Her music is probably good, but I doubt that it’s usually great.

          • soloner@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            You have to explore all her albums in order to really form that opinion. People who like that kind of music will do so, and likely decide that she is phenomenal.

            But then folks like you and me will not want to take time to ingest all that music that doesn’t appeal to us, so we have to speculate based off what we get exposed to which is generally her pop songs on the radio and such. But we aren’t really getting the full Taylor Swift. So it’s like we’re judging a sample of her stuff (which sounds like a lot of other pop cuz all pop sounds basically the same) and oversimplify what she offers to music.

            I’m completely speculating… Like I said we’d have to dive into all those albums and listen to really form a meaningful opinion.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          A couple people have mentioned her range, but they also only mention her relationship and breakup songs. What else does she sing about that gives her range?

          • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            When people talk about her range they are usually talking about musical styles, she has a lot of different sounds. Not all of her songs are about relationships, but probably most of them, they are not all about breakups though. That isn’t too uncommon though, probably one of the most common things people sing about.

            • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              Totally agree, relationships breakups probably cover a large percentage of pop music anyway.

              Does she have a lot of different sounds just in pop music or does she also delve into completely different genres?

              • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                Probably not like Andre 3000 going out and making an ambient album, but there are a lot of differences stylistically. For example her pandemic albums Folklore and Evermore are a lot less traditional pop, and can be more folk sounding. Doing some songs with Bon Iver helped that too.

                I think a lot of times people associate her with bubblegum pop from a lot of the singles that came out maybe ten years ago and were heavily played on the radio but that hasn’t been the sound for a while.

        • Varyk@sh.itjust.worksOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          Except for all of the artists who don’t.

          And a lot of the artists who do “go off” don’t get 81 awards in a decade and a half.

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          As someone who couldn’t name a single Swift song up until a couple of months ago — From what I read she writes the vast majority of her songs, which is exceptionally rare for pop stars; especially from such a young age… The songs may be simplistic and formulaic, but the lyrics are decent for the age they were written at, and the work ethic and genre jumping is impressive. The most admirable thing about her is how she’s screwing venture capitalists by re-recording all the songs she wrote. I hope she starts redistributing all that wealth she’s extracting.

          • Herbal Gamer@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ok just don’t forget she came from money and had opportunities:

            She traveled there with her mother at age eleven to visit record labels

            • NaN@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              7 months ago

              That definitely helps. I think it’s interesting that access to uncommon opportunities is generally presented as a negative thing in Taylor Swift’s case but ignored for Michael Jackson or even contemporaries like Beyonce.

      • ominouslemon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        She is a damn fine businesswoman. She was able to use social media to have a relationship with her followers and build a large audience. That’s one of the main reasons she became famous.

        Also, there have been a couple of situations that benefited her fame, such as the Kanye incident

    • audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      I disagree with this. She’s a pretty amazing song writer, which is really uncommon for pop stars. I can see why someone would think she’s more like pizza if you only listen to the hits, but if you actually sit down and listen to a whole album you’ll find that there aren’t many songs that are just flat-out bad. Actually, one my favorites by her is a B side. You can actually track her progress as a musician from fairly generic country artist to someone who has a really unique and uncomplicated sound. I mean, I get why people go for the “simple = easy”, but that’s simply not the case. It’s really difficult to write a song that is as clean and as well put together as she does and still have it be good. To continue your food metaphor, Taylor would be like sushi; there doesn’t have to be a ton of ingredients to be incredibly delicious.

      Then you also have to consider that she’s Gen Z, has been doing this for 18 years, and has managed to stay fairly relevant most of that time. Like she really is the only Gen Z pop star who has managed to stay in the limelight without dropping out of being a complete tool (Justin Bieber).

      You also have to consider that for a long time she had a carefully crafted public image as a champion of the LGBTQ+ community. Whether she actually is or isn’t doesn’t really matter (I personally think it’s a lot of rainbow-washing) when you have bops like “You Need to Calm Down”. Or the fact that she features a bunch of trans people in the video she directed for “Lavender Haze”.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        How is she an amazing song writer? What song do you think stands out and is amazing?

        • QuesoBlanco@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          I feel like this is kind of a trap question. Everything about this entire thread feels that way - I don’t want it to seem as if I’m attacking you here - and it’s a microcosm of why discussion of Swift is so polarizing. For some reason, she, more than any other artist I can call to mind, is discussed in black and white terminology. There’s almost no middle ground. You need to either love her or hate her.

          Does she possess the lyrical genius of, like, Leonard Cohen? I mean, I don’t know. I think she’s pretty great, but back in the day I’d have been stoned to death on r/Music for suggesting they were in the same league.

          What I will say is I think she’s as honest as Cohen was, and that’s something the best songwriters all have. I think she writes from an extremely authentic place, and I respect the hell out of that. In recent years, I think co-writing with Jack Antonoff has only further unlocked her potential.

          Some examples of hers I think are great - You’re On Your Own Kid, Champagne Problems, and My Tears Ricochet.

          Her pop stuff has some great lyricism as well, but pop music as a genre is generally under appreciated for its lyrics. Obviously, not in all cases; there’s a shitload of manufactured garbage out there. But most of the 1989 album is borderline - if not outright - excellent in this regard. It didn’t get any serious attention though until that shitbag Ryan Adams covered the whole thing, and got people to hear the lyrics in a different way.

          • 1984@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            I understand you feel that way. But this thread made me give her a chance, so I listened to a couple of her albums. They were pretty decent. Catchy music, good car music. So I get it, she is pretty good. I guess I wouldn’t call her amazing but I can see how others may feel that way.

            I haven’t looked into her lyrics yet. If she is honest, that sounds great to me.

            Thank you. :)

      • bostonbananarama@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        She’s a pretty amazing song writer, which is really uncommon for pop stars.

        Just because you make pizza, doesn’t mean you don’t make great pizza. I’m not saying she’s out here making $0.99 Mr. P’s Pizzas (“fabulous” in their own right).

        Then you also have to consider that she’s Gen Z, has been doing this for 18 years, and has managed to stay fairly relevant most of that time.

        I’ve considered it, but it’s not true. She may appeal to Gen Z but she was born in '89, making her dead center of being a millennial.

        I’ve never said she’s bad, but if you’ve ever listened to more complex music, her’s isn’t that. She’s great at what she does, and seemingly smart and levelheaded, and that’s fantastic. But to say her songs are masterpieces that are like beautifully woven tapestry of lyrics and music, I don’t see it. And, in all fairness, if they were, she’d probably have a fan base 95% smaller.

    • Mango@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The world class chef can only cook for a few at a time. Digital distribution means big voice.