• metallic_z3r0@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’d personally prefer 12 months with 30 days each, a 6-day week (makes for even rotations in shifts, 4 on 2 off), and an inter-calary week of 5 to 6 days at the new year.

    If we’re going for broke on this I’d also want to convert to the dozenal system over decimal, as 12 is more easily divisible by smaller numbers which means easier division for numbers we use more often (like 3 or 4), which means that ¼ would be 0.3 and ⅓ would be 0.4.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I would say that at the very least we could adjust February by taking a day from July and August and the extra day every four years could be added inbetween them as a “monthless” day in the middle of the summer.

    • teft@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      Fuck it. Lets get real and just go all the way back to Sumeria. Sexagesimal numbering system here we come.

    • Lmaydev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like that with 13 each month starts on a Monday and ends on a Sunday. Makes that calculation super easy.

    • crapwittyname@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      A dozenal system is more difficult in multiplication. Decimal: 10^7 =10000000, 10^8=100000000, 10^9=1000000000, etc.
      Dozenal: 12^7= 35831808, 12^8=429981696, 12^9=5159780352.
      Gets very messy very quick.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        In dozenal (duodecimal), 6+6= a dozen, but we write “dozen” as “10”. A dozen dozen is not 144; it is “100”. 3 dozen is not 36; 3 dozen is “30”.

        We would have two additional digits between 9 and “10”.

        We would have to rewrite our multiplication table entirely. 26=10. 36=16. 4*6=20. But, when we do memorize the new table, it is just as consistent and functional as our decimal system.

    • Plopp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 months ago

      12? Ew. As someone who relies on my fingers to count I repudiate such discriminatory system!

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        you can still use your fingers. it’s how we got our standard of time. Back then they counted the joints in our fingers minus thumb. 4 sets of 3 for our four fingers and 3 joints per finger. Then 5 sets of 12 to make 60. as they would use the fingers on the other hand to track how many times they counted to 12.

        • teft@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          My favorite system like this is the Oksapmin counting system. They use a base 27 system. It’s based upon counting upper body parts.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 months ago

        You still get to count on your fingers. You use your thumb to count each bone in your 4 fingers to get up to 12. (“10” in the new system). Then you have the option to either continue with your other hand up to 24, or use it as an abacus, keeping your place while you count up to 144 (“100”).

        • Plopp@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          6 months ago

          You expect me to remember all that? Which thumbs? How many knuckles? When? Who?