We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.
We Asked A.I. to Create the Joker. It Generated a Copyrighted Image.::Artists and researchers are exposing copyrighted material hidden within A.I. tools, raising fresh legal questions.
Stable diffusion is in the name for a reason. It’s supposed to do that. The new image is now real, legally protected art, what makes it unscrupulous was how private/ copyrighted material was scraped.
I’m not trying to refute the article, but my point is… this point didn’t need to be made at all.
Until there’s legal precedent for prosecution or laws clarified that AI cannot be trained on copyrighted material without the express permission of the author, it needs to be named and shamed. Otherwise it’s piracy on a breathtaking scale being turned into profit for Open AI with most people not knowing what the problem/big deal is.