• Hegar@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    7 months ago

    We’re actively blocking the rest of the world’s efforts to stop netanyahu’s genocide. That clearly makes us a responsibility party. The intercept is one of the few sources of actual journalism in the US.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      Are they doing something other than vetoing UN resolutions? Cause those are about as effective as protest voting for third parties in US elections.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cause those are about as effective as protest voting for third parties in US elections.

        They’re that ineffective when you have a veto power in your back. Otherwise they can do a lot.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      The Intercept? Are you kidding me?! They are openly committed to advocacy journalism. They don’t even make a pretense of trying to be fair-minded, objective or operating in good-faith. Greenwald is an attorney who’s openly said that he approaches journalism the same way he approaches a case as a litigator.

      I am a journalist by formal academic training --though I don’t really work in the business anymore-- and I can tell you for a fact that The Intercept is basically a case study in how many different ways a publication can violate SPJ’s code of ethics. They are a fucking disgrace to the profession and it’s galling that people like you take them seriously.