• JakenVeina@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    I like TypeScript less for its ability to categorize my grocery list and more for its ability to stop anyone from putting cyanide on it.

    • DrM@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hate Typescript for promising me that nobody can put cyanide on the list, but in reality it disallows ME from putting cyanide on the list, but everyone else from the outside is still allowed to do so by using the API which is plain JavaScript again

        • DrM@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          The main problem with JavaScript and TypeScript is that there is such a little entrybarrier to it, that way too many people use it without understanding it. The amount of times that we had major issues in production because someone doesn’t understand TypeScript is not countable anymore and our project went live only 4 months ago.

          For example, when you use nest.js and want to use a boolean value as a query parameter.

          As an example:

          @Get('valueOfMyBoolean')
          @ApiQuery(
            {
              name: 'myBoolean',
              type: boolean,
            }
          )
          myBooleanFunction(
            @Query('myBoolean') myBoolean: boolean
          ){
            if(myBoolean){
              return 'myBoolean is true';
            }
            return 'myBoolean is false';
          }
          

          You see this code. You don’t see anything wrong with it. The architect looks at it in code review and doesn’t see anything wrong with it. But then you do a GET https://something.com/valueOfMyBoolean?myBoolean=false and you get “myBoolean is true” and if you do typeOf(myBoolean) you will see that, despite you declaring it twice, myBoolean is not a boolean but a string. But when running the unit-tests, myBoolean is a boolean.

          • jpeps@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Typically when creating API interfaces you’d be better off marking the inputs as unknown, and then using something like Zod to validate the types

          • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            I’ve never used TS, and I’m not exactly sure what nest.js even does, but building a TypeScript project on top of a JavaScript library not designed for it seems like asking for trouble. Is that standard practice?

              • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Web dev continues to be cursed, I guess.

                If I really needed to use a JS library in TS, I’d have to build some sort of adapter between the two that crashes whenever the JS library (that doesn’t know anything about your types) breaks the typing rules. Anything else will inevitably lead to the above “fun” kind of bugs.

                • DrM@feddit.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t think that this would work, there are no types anymore during runtime because everything is translated into plain js on build. TypeScript only exists during development