• Guenther_Amanita@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      While not agreeing, I still upvoted.

      Why do you think that way? What’s your opinion on FOSS-Androids like GrapheneOS?

      With “Android”, do you just mean Samsung’s spin for example?

      What alternatives do you have in mind? Is iOS better in your opinion? Did mobile Linux get better?

      • toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        GrapheneOS only works with Google hardware. Part of the Android appeal versus iOS is the wide variety of hardware options allowing consumers to find the right hardware for themselves. Instead you are chained to Google’s decisions; if they are slow to add a hardware feature or stupidly remove a feature—like the headphone jack—then you are SoL on upgrades.

        • catacomb@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah, I think that comes from the developer having high standards for hardware security. The effort put in is a waste if the hardware fails. I would have thought Samsung would have been suitable too, though.

          What about /e/OS or plain old degoogled Lineage? I like it as a phone OS, it’s just a shame the app ecosystem is so dependent on Google’s services.

          • toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            I go the unGoogled LineageOS route for more hardware options. I wish postmarketOS or Capyloon were more viable to leave the duopoly.