• AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    True.

    That said, on that specific night, women were lucky the patriarchy was still in place, as ladies first chivalry, based on the idea that women were objects/property to be cared for rather than individuals who could/should fend for themselves, still applied and well over twice as many women were given seats on lifeboats as men, which would be seen as really patronizing today.

    Everything has a cost, even equality.

    • ivanafterall@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      As a man, I would have fought tooth and nail for a seat, but not out of selfishness.

      “PLEASE UNDERSTAND I’M DOING THIS FOR THE CAUSE OF WOMEN’S EQUALITY!!!”

    • money_loo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      For sure.

      It’s just once they got back home they still weren’t allowed to vote, grow professional careers, get equal access to higher education, own their own property while with a man because of coverture laws, be allowed to play in athletic sports or form leagues, hold any real position of political power, get a divorce easily to escape abusive relationships, allowed to be legally raped by their spouses as much as he wanted while having zero reproductive rights, etc.

      Just some give and take for that one day for some unlucky dudes, as you put it.

      • funkajunk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Those dudes weren’t just “unlucky”, they fucking died. Stop focusing on genetalia and look at humanity.

        • money_loo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          …it was a tongue-in-cheek reply to the dismissive retort of the person I was responding to…the tone of which was meant to convey the ridiculousness of the statement, which they heavily edited to be far less sexist, to their credit.

          Also how would you like me to not recognize the disparity imparted by their “genitals” in a comment discussing how the people with openings for genitals were allowed special treatment at this time, and less so at later times. It’s literally the entire context.