• OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.mlEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    I have no idea what that mod is even trying to argue for. Is he saying AI generated child p∆rn doesn’t count as “assault”, so it’s not CSAM? Like it’s a werid line to draw, even if true. If he’s saying that AI generated child p∆rn is fine though, he’s still a pedo

    • 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒍@sopuli.xyzEnglish
      0·
      4 months ago

      yeah, i thought it’s a consensus that pedo fiction is still pedo, like erotic comic involving minors is pedo for me, even if no child is hurt it’s still pedo

  • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
    0·
    4 months ago

    Huh? The screenshot says they think generated pictures are not abusive. Not the it’s not csam.

    That’s a very dangerous way of twisting someone’s words, especially on a subject this emotionally charged.

    • chip16@beehaw.orgEnglish
      0·
      4 months ago

      Go actually look at his comments. Right here he says it isn’t csam. https://lemmy.ml/post/17231524/11844720

      He says it’s “defamation and libel, but not csam”.

      He’s a typical garbage person being a typical reddit mod here. He bans people for not agreeing with him and everything I’ve seen from him in different places shows me he should not be a mod anywhere.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.devEnglish
        0·
        4 months ago

        Is he banning them for disagreeing, or for people calling him a pedo over an autistic semantics discussion?

        Mind you, I agree that when you hold controversial opinions about certain topics people are likely to discuss, you shouldn’t be a mod. Then again, if you value your sanity and blood pressure, you shouldn’t want to be a mod anyway - it’s a thankless job.