• Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      the synthetic nicotine being produce is done with green chemistry meaning no heavy metals used in synthesis

      with the nicotine being lab made no ground pollutants such as lead and other heavy metals are present just like fake vanilla extract which most seasoning coming from India with polluted soil

      also less soil less environmental impact

      the ingredients have gotten safer over time as well also leading to changes in other industries

      hugely better product both health and environmental and all around

      not to mention not have the ill effects of second hand smoke

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 months ago

        None of that has to do with your claim, and it is also more claims instead of evidence.

        Where’s your evidence that there is a safe level of nicotine consumption?

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Hi, resident drug nerd checking in.

          Nicotine can be consumed safely. There’s a Huberman Lab podcast on it. Nicotine Gum and Nicotine Lozenges are very safe, for example. And less addictive than vaping (note, less, not non-addictive).

          Vaping is safe-er than tobacco. So, it is harm reduction as it’s not carcinogenic as far as we know (contamination aside). However, the vape route of administration passes the blood brain faster than combustion, making it actually more addictive than tobacco and more likely to cause acute overdose symptoms. Thankfully, inhaled nicotine has a very short half life, so laying down for a few minutes generally allows a person to return to baseline.

          And, not agreeing with anything Verdant Banana said about cannabis scheduling. Some tinfoil hat stuff imo.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 months ago

            Safer is not safe.

            I agree, it’s safer. But how can we know it’s safe below a certain amount for lifelong vapers when there hasn’t been enough time to do a long-term study?

            Wouldn’t (and I say this as a long-term cannabis vaporizer myself) putting anything into the lungs on a regular basis other than air be inherently unsafe long-term?

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Nothing is 100% safe. Which is why harm reduction is an important part of the conversation when discussing drug addiction.

              Water is safer than tea. Tea safer than coffee. All three can in theory kill you if consumed in large enough quantities.

              Anyway, I figured I would dig around more on vaping instead of just glancing at the top search result.

              And, I take what I said back. Nicotine by itself causes cancer. Tobacco just makes it more likely.

              https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9222281/

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 months ago

                I don’t disagree with you on the “safer” thing at all, but OP said that it was “safe.”

                But this has become moot anyway based on your research.

                • treefrog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, my bad for glancing at the top search result before I made my long-winded post above lol.

                  Hope you’re well, Mr. Squid.