• EarMaster@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Discourse exists and is free to self-host and open source. Compared to classic forum software (like most *bb variants) it is a pleasure to use and feels not like a remnant of a lost age.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        NodeBB is probably less painful to deal with as a system adminstrator, since it doesn’t use Ruby.

        Lots of forum software used to have threaded discussions, but most of them settled on a more linear commenting experience, maybe 20 years ago.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Because the vote system inherently supports popularity which creates content masking issues and usually results in communities with mods that want to keep that system.

      Stack overflow has this exact same issue where stupid crap gets upvoted and useful stuff gets nuked so users don’t see things that would otherwise be important or useful.

      Lemmy somewhat avoids it due to the relatively low number of posts, but that could easily change.

  • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I advocate for two things, oddly things I never would have in earlier internet:

    • Paid forums. A one time payment for registration.

    • Strict rules and quick bans. But allow offenders to buy back in. Permaban for serious offenses. .

    Why? Because if it costs you $10 or 15 to re-activate after screwing around, you’re much more likely to read the room and not fuck around too much with others. It encourages users to point out bad behavior, and mods to act decisively. If the mods or management totally suck, then it can go sour, but that’s true of any community.

    In this case though it can at least partially help to offset costs from shitty users, and keep bots at bay by making them cost a registration fee.

    I don’t love it as a “solution”, but when Facebook was small, people behaved better. But now people post the most unhinged shit ever under their full legal name, so no amount of daylight is going to put the proverbial trolls back in their cages. Just gotta lock them out of civil spaces.

    You wanna talk about Honda engine tuning here with us? Don’t be a fucking asshole, or get banned.

    You wanna chat with fans of 50s cinema and the rise of modern camera film technique? Do it without brining up woke/trump/biden/Covid or get out.

    I like that we have free stuff like lemmy and reddit for now, but bots are getting far, far worse.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Honestly to avoid the immense botspam coming for small orgs, you need either a literal army of volunteers, or some kind of “realID” type check to verify they’re human, and I hate that concept immensely as well.

        Giant if, but if you could do a one way cryptographic check against an ID to verify its legitimate, without sending anything off the server elsewhere, then a forum could bind your current username to a state issued ID, at least until it’s reissued. And then you could at least reasonably think these users are human.

        But who wants to give that info to a stranger online. Even if the hash is unique to the site based on their own seed, the average person doesn’t understand that, and it feels like handing over your actual privacy.

        Setting aside that PCs don’t have NFC readers as a standard feature as well.

        Everything I think would be effectivd boils down though to needing to know that something exists in meatspace on the other end, and being able to use that to manage your bans. At least 10bux is just money, and not your ID.

        • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          This is the thing, the balance of anonymity and preventing people using that anonymity to be a tit.
          In my opinion, one of the answers is keeping the signal-to-noise high: Make sure that there are enough sensible people in a community that if someone starts acting up, they’re alone. And then they can either correct their course, or get banned, ideally before the next moron shows up.

          And part of the way of achieving that is raising the barrier to sign-up, if only a little, and rate limiting.

    • Digitalprimate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well you have just described Metafilter. I’m a liberal a lefty as can be, and eventually even I got tired of the drama and obvious virtue signaling. And at the end of the day, drama and less-than-appropriate virtue signaling were what the mods wanted.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Communities can eventually become insular and crappy, that isn’t anything new. I haven’t ever used/heard of metafilter , but I believe you.

        Not a problem unique to lefties or hardcore MAGA folks. It’s just community management for free by volunteers eventually means you have some echo chambering. The site/community manager can steer the mod policies, but without leadership you get fiefdoms. Look at some subreddits that speed run this process.

    • palordrolap@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      One downside to this is that $10 is worth more to one person than it is to another, and I can’t see how that can be fixed.

    • Omniraptor@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We already tried this with something awful and it was still in fact kinda awful

    • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If there is payment, better support crypto too, because this way you wouldn’t force people to KYC themselves, as well as wouldn’t exclude people from sanctioned regions.

      • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Nope. Imo the point is to avoid cryptobro bots and the like, not invite them.

        Plus crypto is volatile and you’d have to manage it a lot more to keep it pegged at “expensive enough”

        And even then, you won’t discourage a troll who just happens to have an absurd stash of coins without pricing out legitimate users. A bot farmer with 50k in bitcoin would drop a few hundredths of a coin just to make your day worse.

        • Hammerheart@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          Plus crypto is volatile and you’d have to manage it a lot more to keep it pegged at “expensive enough”

          this is a solved problem. Just change the crypto cost according to its exchange value. I pay for my vpn and my vps with crypto.

        • EngineerGaming@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          “Cryptobros” =/= “people using crypto”, because this is a legitimate usecase. You can see it discussed on Lemmy too. This is how I can pay for my VPS while my card doesn’t work. This is how I would pay for a service even if my card did work, but I didn’t want to attach pretty much my real name to it. But yea, I agree that it might be complicated logistically. Have seen services where you can buy prepaid cards for crypto - at lest that should work.

          • ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yes, but my point was more so that crypto bros swim in that water too, and my thinking was more so to discourage assholes rather than attain 100% immutable anonymity.

  • Queen HawlSera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Especially since Reddit passes out bans like candy, it’s the biggest forum on the internet and I can’t use it because of a site wide ban that I didn’t deserve.

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I dunno, when you’re talking about really specialized niches, there are still plenty of forums. Like, 600rr.net; it’s dedicated to nothing but Honda CBR600RR motorcycles. If you have a problem with a 600RR, the answer is probably there, and the forum is still ticking along because it’s just too hard to find those super-niche answers on Reddit. Want gun content with a healthy dose of homo/transphobia and christian nationalism? AR15.com has you covered. Want to talk about the minutiae of reloading and be autistically-focused on long-range accuracy? SnipersHide.com is your place. (They’re a bit fuddy though.)

  • limelight79@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    I run an internet forum for a very specific topic. I have to manually register people, because before I did that, spammers would come in and crap all over everything. (Fortunately it’s not a very popular topic, so I only have to register new accounts a few times each month.) I run the forum on my own dime, no advertising or anything, as a side hobby.

    There’s also a very active Facebook group. The Facebook group is great for general conversation, but often when a technical question comes up, please just link to the forum where the info is stored. Searching in Facebook is terrible, and what happens if Facebook decides to block access to history for some reason? (Not that they necessarily would, but I’ve seen it happen many times. Remember when Photobucket blocked access to old pictures unless you had a paid account? We lost a bunch of useful pictures on the forum when that happened.)

  • christophski@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’ve said this before, the thing I hate about reddit and discord is that you only get exposed to “current” threads or “top” threads. On old forums everything was just there and if someone commented on it, it came back to the top and re-ignited conversations.

    I was a big user of the command and conquer forums and I definitely miss the community of it. But that may just be the scale of Internet then compared to now. Back then you saw the same users every day and we ended up chatting on msn and working on projects together. I couldn’t tell you any users on my instance or elsewhere other than the admins of my instance.

  • MaXsteri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Internet Forums disappearing is a real shame.

    For my hobby there’s still lots and lots of old and relevant archived forum threads that regularly help me out.

    But for new information, that has all moved to Facebook Groups. This forces me to keep a Facebook account, which I hate and would otherwise ditch in a heartbeat.

    • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Have you been to Facebook lately? It’s like 90% AI spam of “why don’t pictures like this trend” with some body horror Jesus.

  • Peddlephile@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Welcome to the new era of enshittification where you’ll eventually have to subscribe to access or make posts, and none of it will be searchable on any search engines.

    • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      And the shoe will probably drop at some point. Something like “communities must have nitro to access posts from more than 6 months ago”.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      New?

      Anyway, I think all this is a result of thieves in governments becoming conscious of how the Web works and breaking it with the means they have - helping corps and making litigation more and more likely for anything small and well-behaving, because of failing to remove something etc.

      It just makes sense. In 2005 with all the problems with search engines of that time, and with having to use web directories and ask people, you had a lot of information at the tips of your fingers. You could read a lot of things about people who would prefer to do their stuff more confidentially, like mafia bosses and bureaucrats and politicians.

      • nossaquesapao@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        At least Reddit is searchable

        How long until they restrict viewing the full contents of posts without logging in?

          • pyrflie@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            Can’t imagine it lasting too much longer. AI has poisoned the already poisoned search watering hole. Google search hasn’t actually updated in 4 years due to to advertising/marketing, they are combating SEO not acknowledging it’s their own customers. Googles Search results are shit and have been for at least 5 years cause they sold out the program.

    • Hoomod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Commenting/making posts has always required an account of some sort, at least as far back as I can remember. Maybe the IRC days you just needed a name

  • BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    if anyone here used to go on kongregate a lot, go check it out now. it is depressing. they dont even have chat rooms anymore

  • someguy3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Every now and then I get a forum as a search result and they’re just so clunky. Replies are spaced out too much, no chains, everyone has a long winded signature phrase. I’m glad it went to this kind of format.

    • GenosseFlosse@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Forums existed when everyone had a 1024x800 computer monitor on his desk, before mobile Webbrowsers where a thing. The layout did make sense at the time.

  • 4am@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hey guys not to be a downer but like…what DO we do when a federated instance goes down and takes all its content with it?

    • BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      If you search back far enough on some lemmy instances that have defederated others, you’ll find ghosts of old content from those defederated servers, but it’s all local to whatever instance you’re viewing it on. A large amount of the content from the server that went down should also exist on the servers that server was federated with.

      These lemmy instances have got to start running out of storage though, I haven’t heard of any kind of automated purging. I’d bet someone somewhere is already working on an archive lemmy.

      • GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Just for context, the full database of feddit.uk compresses down to about 4GB. I am not sure what’s going to happen to the ghosts long term, but I don’t think storage will be a huge issue.

      • KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Speaking explicitly of text, they can likely be compressed to an insane degree instead of purged, if someone wanted to. For comparison, the entirety of Wikipedia (text only) is ~22GB.

    • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      So this pretty much happened with feddit.de

      The admin took off for a business trip and his backup forgot the password and locked himself out. Now the admin seems to have vanished and the server shit itself, making all previously posted pictures unavailable.

      The solution is that a bunch of lemmings are forming a “Verein” (Kind of Like a club I suppose?) and will build an entirely new German instance.

      So, it’s not pretty.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        If someone hasn’t written a software package to do so already, it’s probably possible to write one to dump and clone all the comments and posts on a server.

        • Ibuthyr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          The comments fortunately are still there, but the images are all gone. They had some trouble that was image-related which led to the server collapsing at some stage. I can’t recall the specifics unfortunately.

    • stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Same as when one of the big name hosting companies takes a site down. You hope it’s archived, and if it was important enough to you, hopefully you saved it to your personal server.

      What you’re describing is a major benefit of federation. Any site can be taken down. But when a federated server goes down it’s because the site owner exercised their control over their own data. If Google or Amazon takes a site down, you lose your data, but they keep copies to use however they want.